* [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Support more granular vrealloc() sizing
@ 2025-04-26 0:11 Kees Cook
2025-04-26 10:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2025-04-26 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Kees Cook, Erhard Furtner, Danilo Krummrich, Michal Hocko,
Vlastimil Babka, Uladzislau Rezki, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
linux-hardening
Introduce struct vm_struct::requested_size so that the requested
(re)allocation size is retained separately from the allocated area
size. This means that KASAN will correctly poison the correct spans
of requested bytes. This also means we can support growing the usable
portion of an allocation that can already be supported by the existing
area's existing allocation.
Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250408192503.6149a816@outsider.home/
Fixes: 3ddc2fefe6f3 ("mm: vmalloc: implement vrealloc()")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
---
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
---
include/linux/vmalloc.h | 1 +
mm/vmalloc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 31e9ffd936e3..5ca8d4dd149d 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
unsigned int nr_pages;
phys_addr_t phys_addr;
const void *caller;
+ unsigned long requested_size;
};
struct vmap_area {
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 3ed720a787ec..2d7511654831 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static inline void setup_vmalloc_vm(struct vm_struct *vm,
{
vm->flags = flags;
vm->addr = (void *)va->va_start;
- vm->size = va_size(va);
+ vm->size = vm->requested_size = va_size(va);
vm->caller = caller;
va->vm = vm;
}
@@ -3133,6 +3133,7 @@ struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size,
area->flags = flags;
area->caller = caller;
+ area->requested_size = requested_size;
va = alloc_vmap_area(size, align, start, end, node, gfp_mask, 0, area);
if (IS_ERR(va)) {
@@ -4063,6 +4064,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vzalloc_node_noprof);
*/
void *vrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
+ struct vm_struct *vm = NULL;
+ size_t alloced_size = 0;
size_t old_size = 0;
void *n;
@@ -4072,15 +4075,17 @@ void *vrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
}
if (p) {
- struct vm_struct *vm;
-
vm = find_vm_area(p);
if (unlikely(!vm)) {
WARN(1, "Trying to vrealloc() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n", p);
return NULL;
}
- old_size = get_vm_area_size(vm);
+ alloced_size = get_vm_area_size(vm);
+ old_size = vm->requested_size;
+ if (WARN(alloced_size < old_size,
+ "vrealloc() has mismatched area vs requested sizes (%p)\n", p))
+ return NULL;
}
/*
@@ -4088,14 +4093,26 @@ void *vrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
* would be a good heuristic for when to shrink the vm_area?
*/
if (size <= old_size) {
- /* Zero out spare memory. */
- if (want_init_on_alloc(flags))
+ /* Zero out "freed" memory. */
+ if (want_init_on_free())
memset((void *)p + size, 0, old_size - size);
+ vm->requested_size = size;
kasan_poison_vmalloc(p + size, old_size - size);
- kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(p, size, KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL);
return (void *)p;
}
+ /*
+ * We already have the bytes available in the allocation; use them.
+ */
+ if (size <= alloced_size) {
+ kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(p + old_size, size - old_size,
+ KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL);
+ /* Zero out "alloced" memory. */
+ if (want_init_on_alloc(flags))
+ memset((void *)p + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
+ vm->requested_size = size;
+ }
+
/* TODO: Grow the vm_area, i.e. allocate and map additional pages. */
n = __vmalloc_noprof(size, flags);
if (!n)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Support more granular vrealloc() sizing
2025-04-26 0:11 [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Support more granular vrealloc() sizing Kees Cook
@ 2025-04-26 10:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2025-04-26 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook
Cc: Andrew Morton, Erhard Furtner, Michal Hocko, Vlastimil Babka,
Uladzislau Rezki, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linux-hardening
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 05:11:07PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Introduce struct vm_struct::requested_size so that the requested
> (re)allocation size is retained separately from the allocated area
> size. This means that KASAN will correctly poison the correct spans
> of requested bytes. This also means we can support growing the usable
> portion of an allocation that can already be supported by the existing
> area's existing allocation.
>
> Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250408192503.6149a816@outsider.home/
> Fixes: 3ddc2fefe6f3 ("mm: vmalloc: implement vrealloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-26 10:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-26 0:11 [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Support more granular vrealloc() sizing Kees Cook
2025-04-26 10:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox