From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm THP section
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:57:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAp7ggknCytUyAXd@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424111632.103637-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> As part of the ongoing efforts to sub-divide memory management
> maintainership and reviewership, establish a section for Transparent Huge
> Page support and add appropriate maintainers and reviewers.
I'm quite queasy about this. I'm doing my best to make "THP" disappear
as a concept. How would you define what THP is? Originally, it was
PMD-sized-and-aligned allocations, and some of the way we expose it to
userspace, that's still the interpretation. But we also have folios which
are of some hardware-defined magic sizes, as well as (for filesystems,
at least) random other non-zero orders.
Memory is just managed in variously sized quantities. There should be
nothing magic about "THP", and I'm still annoyed at the anon-mem people
for baking various magic sizes into user-visible APIs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 11:16 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-24 11:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-24 11:28 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-24 11:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-24 11:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-24 11:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-24 12:23 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-24 17:57 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-04-24 18:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-24 18:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-24 19:38 ` Zi Yan
2025-04-24 19:50 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAp7ggknCytUyAXd@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox