From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ruihan Li <lrh2000@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:11:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAjK8Yq3OJH5hP12@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423081828.608422-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 08:52:45AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> Implement for_each_valid_pfn() based on two helper functions.
>
> The first_valid_pfn() function largely mirrors pfn_valid(), calling into
> a pfn_section_first_valid() helper which is trivial for the !VMEMMAP case,
> and in the VMEMMAP case will skip to the next subsection as needed.
>
> Since next_valid_pfn() knows that its argument *is* a valid PFN, it
> doesn't need to do any checking at all while iterating over the low bits
> within a (sub)section mask; the whole (sub)section is either present or
> not.
>
> Note that the VMEMMAP version of pfn_section_first_valid() may return a
> value *higher* than end_pfn when skipping to the next subsection, and
> first_valid_pfn() happily returns that higher value. This is fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Previous-revision-reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 26 ++++++++--
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> index 74d0077cc5fa..044536da3390 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> @@ -31,12 +31,28 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> }
> #define pfn_valid pfn_valid
>
> +static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *pfn)
> +{
> + /* avoid <linux/mm.h> include hell */
> + extern unsigned long max_mapnr;
> + unsigned long pfn_offset = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
> +
> + if (*pfn < pfn_offset) {
> + *pfn = pfn_offset;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if ((*pfn - pfn_offset) < max_mapnr)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
Looks like it's a leftover from one of the previous versions.
> #ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
> -#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
> - for ((pfn) = max_t(unsigned long, (start_pfn), ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
> - (pfn) < min_t(unsigned long, (end_pfn), \
> - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
> - (pfn)++)
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
> + for (pfn = max_t(unsigned long, start_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
> + pfn < min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
> + pfn++)
And this one is probably a rebase artifact?
With FLATMEM changes dropped
This-revision-also-reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> #endif /* for_each_valid_pfn */
> #endif /* valid_pfn */
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 7:52 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:11 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-04-23 12:05 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm, PM: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in kernel/power/snapshot.c David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm, x86: Use for_each_valid_pfn() from __ioremap_check_ram() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm/mm_init: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in init_unavailable_range() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 9:35 ` Ruihan Li
2025-04-23 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAjK8Yq3OJH5hP12@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lrh2000@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox