linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmalloc.c: optimize code in decay_va_pool_node() a little bit
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:51:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aABswErLwX7o7OXa@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_-1ozajrbaVLq6m@pc636>

On 04/16/25 at 03:50pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:39:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > When purge lazily freed vmap areas, VA stored in vn->pool[] will also be
> > taken away into free vmap tree partially or completely accordingly, that
> > is done in decay_va_pool_node(). When doing that, for each pool of node,
> > the whole list is detached from the pool for handling. At this time,
> > that pool is empty. It's not necessary to update the pool size each time
> > when one VA is removed and addded into free vmap tree.
> > 
> > Here change code to update the pool size when attaching the pool back.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmalloc.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > index 488d69b56765..bf735c890878 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
> >  	LIST_HEAD(decay_list);
> >  	struct rb_root decay_root = RB_ROOT;
> >  	struct vmap_area *va, *nva;
> > -	unsigned long n_decay;
> > +	unsigned long n_decay, len;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VA_SIZE_PAGES; i++) {
> > @@ -2164,22 +2164,20 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
> >  		list_replace_init(&vn->pool[i].head, &tmp_list);
> >  		spin_unlock(&vn->pool_lock);
> >  
> > -		if (full_decay)
> > -			WRITE_ONCE(vn->pool[i].len, 0);
> > +		len = n_decay = vn->pool[i].len;
> > +		WRITE_ONCE(vn->pool[i].len, 0);
> >  
> >  		/* Decay a pool by ~25% out of left objects. */
> > -		n_decay = vn->pool[i].len >> 2;
> > +		if (!full_decay)
> > +			n_decay >>= 2;
> > +		len -= n_decay;
> >  
> >  		list_for_each_entry_safe(va, nva, &tmp_list, list) {
> > +			if (!n_decay)
> > +				break;
> >  			list_del_init(&va->list);
> >  			merge_or_add_vmap_area(va, &decay_root, &decay_list);
> > -
> > -			if (!full_decay) {
> > -				WRITE_ONCE(vn->pool[i].len, vn->pool[i].len - 1);
> > -
> > -				if (!--n_decay)
> > -					break;
> > -			}
> > +			n_decay--;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/*
> > @@ -2188,9 +2186,10 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
> >  		 * can populate the pool therefore a simple list replace
> >  		 * operation takes place here.
> >  		 */
> > -		if (!full_decay && !list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
> > +		if (!list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
> >  			spin_lock(&vn->pool_lock);
> >  			list_replace_init(&tmp_list, &vn->pool[i].head);
> > +			vn->pool[i].len = len;
> >  			spin_unlock(&vn->pool_lock);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.41.0
> > 
> Which Linux version this patch is based on? I can not apply it.

I can apply them on the latest mainline kernel, next/master and
mm-new branch of akpm/mm.git. I checked just now.

> 
> Small nits:
> 
> <snip>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index c909b8fea6eb..0ae53c997219 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
>  	LIST_HEAD(decay_list);
>  	struct rb_root decay_root = RB_ROOT;
>  	struct vmap_area *va, *nva;
> -	unsigned long n_decay, len;
> +	unsigned long n_decay, pool_len;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VA_SIZE_PAGES; i++) {
> @@ -2164,21 +2164,20 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
>  		list_replace_init(&vn->pool[i].head, &tmp_list);
>  		spin_unlock(&vn->pool_lock);
>  
> -		len = n_decay = vn->pool[i].len;
> +		pool_len = n_decay = vn->pool[i].len;
>  		WRITE_ONCE(vn->pool[i].len, 0);
>  
>  		/* Decay a pool by ~25% out of left objects. */
>  		if (!full_decay)
>  			n_decay >>= 2;
> -		len -= n_decay;
> +		pool_len -= n_decay;
>  
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(va, nva, &tmp_list, list) {
> -			if (!n_decay)
> +			if (!n_decay--)
>  				break;
>  
>  			list_del_init(&va->list);
>  			merge_or_add_vmap_area(va, &decay_root, &decay_list);
> -			n_decay--;
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -2190,7 +2189,7 @@ decay_va_pool_node(struct vmap_node *vn, bool full_decay)
>  		if (!list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
>  			spin_lock(&vn->pool_lock);
>  			list_replace_init(&tmp_list, &vn->pool[i].head);
> -			vn->pool[i].len = len;
> +			vn->pool[i].len = pool_len;
>  			spin_unlock(&vn->pool_lock);
>  		}
>  	}
> <snip>
> 
> on top of this?
> 
> a) decay in "if" statement, no need extra line;
> b) rename len to something obvious - pool_len.

All look good, will add them to this patch 3 of v2. Thanks a lot.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15  2:39 [PATCH 0/5] mm/vmalloc.c: code cleanup and improvements Baoquan He
2025-04-15  2:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/vmalloc.c: change purge_ndoes as local static variable Baoquan He
2025-04-15 10:47   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15 19:08   ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15 23:53   ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-04-15  2:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/vmalloc.c: find the vmap of vmap_nodes in reverse order Baoquan He
2025-04-15 15:25   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15 23:41     ` Baoquan He
2025-04-15 19:09   ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15  2:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmalloc.c: optimize code in decay_va_pool_node() a little bit Baoquan He
2025-04-15 10:29   ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15 14:05     ` Baoquan He
2025-04-15 19:02       ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-16 13:50   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-17  2:51     ` Baoquan He [this message]
2025-04-17 16:18       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15  2:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/vmalloc: optimize function vm_unmap_aliases() Baoquan He
2025-04-15 10:44   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15 19:10   ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15 23:54   ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-04-15  2:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/vmalloc.c: return explicit error value in alloc_vmap_area() Baoquan He
2025-04-15  6:44   ` Baoquan He
2025-04-15  7:22   ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15 13:01     ` Baoquan He
2025-04-15 19:00       ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-15 22:57         ` Baoquan He
2025-04-16 14:28   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-17  3:02     ` Baoquan He
2025-04-17 16:17       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/5] mm/vmalloc.c: code cleanup and improvements Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-15 22:55   ` Baoquan He
2025-04-15 19:06 ` Shivank Garg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aABswErLwX7o7OXa@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox