Re: [PATCH 3/6] f2fs: drop usage of folio_index

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 02:59:05AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> folio_index is only needed for mixed usage of page cache and swap
> cache, for pure page cache usage, the caller can just use
> folio->index instead.
> 
> It can't be a swap cache folio here.  Swap mapping may only call into fs
> through `swap_rw` and that is not supported for f2fs.  So just drop it
> and use folio->index instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> (maintainer:F2FS FILE SYSTEM)
> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> (maintainer:F2FS FILE SYSTEM)
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (open list:F2FS FILE SYSTEM)
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>

> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ int f2fs_read_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (folio_index(folio))
> +	if (folio->index)
>  		folio_zero_segment(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
>  	else
>  		f2fs_do_read_inline_data(folio, ipage);

This hunk is going to conflict with a pair of patches I sent to f2fs-devel
a few weeks ago.  I don't think there's any escaping it, just a heads-up.