From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kselftests: mm: Fix wrong __NR_userfaultfd value
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:44:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ae7dc4-275d-43c3-bf4c-b0090cb6bb12@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240912103151.1520254-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com>
On 9/12/24 04:31, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> The value of __NR_userfaultfd was changed to 282 when
> asm-generic/unistd.h was included. It makes the test to fail every time
> as the correct number of this syscall on x86_64 is 323. Fix the header
> to asm/unistd.h.
>
"please elaborate every time" - I just built on my x86_64 and built
just fine. I am not saying this isn't a problem, it is good to
understand why and how it is failing before making the change.
> Fixes: a5c6bc590094 ("selftests/mm: remove local __NR_* definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> index fc90af2a97b80..bcc73b4e805c6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <math.h>
> -#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <sys/resource.h>
> #include <assert.h>
Also please generate a series with these two patches with cover-letter.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 10:31 Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] kselftests: mm: Fail the test if userfaultfd syscall isn't found Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-12 16:10 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-12 17:28 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-16 6:33 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-12 15:44 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2024-09-16 6:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] kselftests: mm: Fix wrong __NR_userfaultfd value Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-17 1:56 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-18 5:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-18 5:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-20 14:59 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-23 5:35 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-23 16:02 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-24 6:21 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9ae7dc4-275d-43c3-bf4c-b0090cb6bb12@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox