From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8021EB64D8 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 03:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 096C46B0072; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 046A96B0074; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E50488E0001; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21AA6B0072 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3212C0936 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 03:03:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80903485530.03.6F16D88 Received: from out-56.mta0.migadu.com (out-56.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.56]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DCBA0002 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 03:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=S7YHxdHe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of yajun.deng@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yajun.deng@linux.dev ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1686798184; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=tTBLikR+nElJ/6KpNyp6r3fLW0Bxen1kyP8+qa7AGa4=; b=pYPopxgwZwj305Nsw5UpAFKIJs3ToSeaskHfVT7DLgoB5nDiSr5vsaDz5jojq8HAj/JhPI a0fKbq/yxG30vZCyhDXvQOKjYVyct9fdYHBw57swRU5miaM22dBD4s11nWWxJPNyB8Iu4O WXdezoADAxnm1BgYJ8UOhJbiUBfD35o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=S7YHxdHe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of yajun.deng@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yajun.deng@linux.dev ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1686798184; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dBcidDtA1O54xigxC5E+uLx96rMPLum3LjnQOYBEiXhUf5RIy6kRwFkPwGlW19Iiq/VXtt DtdTogmy135WzNC2Nfd/qXGlvZ7axmHd/6UqkDwRgd9L19qQZpMwkYrNJZpLU04as3SJJ9 i2ojJclGLfnuKCpub2UjmzbuhuqI+nY= MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1686798178; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tTBLikR+nElJ/6KpNyp6r3fLW0Bxen1kyP8+qa7AGa4=; b=S7YHxdHe5jFLP5OpRi1b7J95PQyFD7S7V+K9laipGHXyFkg1rW0j87M+UOjkYoj9LOwpMt /dD6EqjaY/qtt6aGfthr2zb8Uh3lhGFEdA4pEmqFMwkWAShT42o9N9ZfTZ5Kq7Bb6WZf1S CvMlMfg/f+gnW64ewyKRdyKa9j+SiDw= Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 03:02:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Yajun Deng" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mm_init.c: remove spinlock in early_pfn_to_nid() To: "Mike Rapoport" Cc: "Greg KH" , rafael@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20230614115339.GX52412@kernel.org> References: <20230614115339.GX52412@kernel.org> <2023061431-litigate-upchuck-7ed1@gregkh> <20230614110324.3839354-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 33DCBA0002 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: yxp4nad5pm7wkr6xxce9g4zxyz5sn44a X-HE-Tag: 1686798181-414259 X-HE-Meta: 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 DLaOSIUq 6W9/ruoty+RdPidEH2VIDuqEPuE1/tPzg1sGXNF7WoBgM/A8kOW9+DAPjV6rlwDMcoy0prBfEW/hiQgq1rTwVJfFM5UXU3OROPqcxhv0lGaZaUTd7rWz+BHaOWYDL1IJQlAe5Acd9KA5Wq3c29eOi9/iB9N47yum7Vil6tPjzrn2xP6rkX2jBJaR2bC42KcQie+ZnVDBUlfwS81THvv9jaAbWD8pSGlxQuxFOR1OQCJqkeIwKD7+XqeAy3Oef0GwI7H9/ X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: June 14, 2023 7:53 PM, "Mike Rapoport" wrote:=0A=0A> Hi= ,=0A> =0A> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:28:32AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:=0A= > =0A>> June 14, 2023 7:09 PM, "Greg KH" wro= te:=0A>> =0A>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 07:03:24PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote= :=0A>> =0A>> When the system boots, only one cpu is enabled before smp_in= it().=0A>> So the spinlock is not needed in most cases, remove it.=0A>> = =0A>> Add spinlock in get_nid_for_pfn() because it is after smp_init().= =0A>> =0A>> So this is two different things at once in the same patch?=0A= >> =0A>> Or are they the same problem and both need to go in to solve it?= =0A>> =0A>> And if a spinlock is not needed at early boot, is it really c= ausing any=0A>> problems?=0A>> =0A>> They are the same problem.=0A>> I ad= ded pr_info in early_pfn_to_nid(), found get_nid_for_pfn() is the only=0A= >> case need to add spinlock.=0A>> This patch tested on my x86 system.=0A= > =0A> Are you sure it'll work on !x86?=0A>=0A=0AI'm probably sure of tha= t, although I don't have a !x86 machine.=0A=0Aearly_pfn_to_nid() is calle= d in smp_init() and kasan_init() on =0Adifferent architectures. If it wor= ks well on x86, it'll work on=0A!x86.=0A=0A =0A>> Signed-off-by: Yajun De= ng =0A>> ---=0A>> drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++++= +--=0A>> mm/mm_init.c | 18 +++---------------=0A>> 2 files changed, 12 in= sertions(+), 17 deletions(-)=0A>> =0A>> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c = b/drivers/base/node.c=0A>> index 9de524e56307..844102570ff2 100644=0A>> -= -- a/drivers/base/node.c=0A>> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c=0A>> @@ -748,8 +7= 48,15 @@ int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid= )=0A>> static int __ref get_nid_for_pfn(unsigned long pfn)=0A>> {=0A>> #i= fdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=0A>> - if (system_state < SYSTEM_RU= NNING)=0A>> - return early_pfn_to_nid(pfn);=0A>> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK= (early_pfn_lock);=0A>> + int nid;=0A>> +=0A>> + if (system_state < SYSTEM= _RUNNING) {=0A>> + spin_lock(&early_pfn_lock);=0A>> + nid =3D early_pfn_t= o_nid(pfn);=0A>> + spin_unlock(&early_pfn_lock);=0A>> =0A>> Adding an ext= ernal lock for when you call a function is VERY dangerous=0A>> as you did= not document this anywhere, and there's no way to enforce it=0A>> proper= ly at all.=0A>> =0A>> I should add a comment before early_pfn_to_nid().= =0A>> =0A>> Does your change actually result in any boot time changes? Ho= w was this=0A>> tested?=0A>> =0A>> Just a bit.=0A> =0A> Just a bit tested= ? Or just a bit of boot time changes?=0A> For the latter, do you have num= bers?=0A> =0A=0AFor the latter, the most beneficial function is memmap_in= it_reserved_pages(),=0Athe boot time changes depending on whether DEFERRE= D_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=0Ais defined or not. =0A=0A-->memmap_init_reserved_pag= es()=0A -->for_each_reserved_mem_range()=0A reserve_bootmem_region= ()=0A -->for()=0A init_reserved_page()=0A --> early_= pfn_to_nid()=0A=0A=0AIf define CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT:=0A=0Abef= ore:=0Amemmap_init_reserved_pages() 1.87 seconds=0Aafter:=0Amemmap_init= _reserved_pages() 1.27 seconds=0A=0A32% time reduction.=0A=0A=0AIf not = define CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT:=0A=0Aearly_pfn_to_nid() is calle= d by few, =0Aboot time didn't change.=0A=0A=0ABy the way, this machine ha= s 190GB RAM.=0A=0A> --=0A> Sincerely yours,=0A> Mike.