Re: [PATCH net-next v22 00/14] Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache for sk_page_frag()

[Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>]

On 2024/10/24 17:05, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just noted MM maintainer and ML was not CC on the cover-letter (but
> they were on the relevant patches), adding them now.
> 
> On 10/19/24 10:27, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> On 10/19/2024 1:39 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> So I still think this set should be split in half in order to make
>>> this easier to review. The ones I have provided a review-by for so far
>>> seem fine to me. I really think if you just submitted that batch first
>>> we can get that landed and let them stew in the kernel for a bit to
>>> make sure we didn't miss anything there.
>>
>> It makes sense to me too that it might be better to get those submitted
>> to get more testing if there is no more comment about it.
>>
>> I am guessing they should be targetting net-next tree to get more
>> testing as all the callers of page_frag API seem to be in the
>> networking, right?
>>
>> Hi, David, Jakub & Paolo
>> It would be good if those patches are just cherry-picked from this
>> patchset as those patches with 'Reviewed-by' tag seem to be applying
>> cleanly. Or any better suggestion here?
> 
> We can cherry pick the patches from the posted series, applying the
> review tags as needed, but we need an explicit ack from the mm

Thanks.
I would be good to cherry pick the below one too, as it has also a
'Reviewed-by' tag. I mentioned that it might be easier to miss that
one because it sits after one without 'Reviewed-by' and it seems to
be also applied cleanly:

[net-next,v22,08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node()

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20241018105351.1960345-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com/

> maintainer, given the mentioned patches touch mostly such code.

Sorry for missing to cc Andrew and MM ML.
Maybe I should have mentioned that Andrew provided an 'Acked-by' in
patch 2, but it is always safer to double check it.

> 
> I would like to avoid repeating a recent incident of unintentionally
> stepping on other subsystem toes.
> 
> @Andrew: are you ok with the above plan?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Paolo
> 
>