From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Bard Liao <bard.liao@intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3956/5128] sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c:132:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES'
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:00:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a93302d2-d76f-95a2-2a7c-bcf34db7bfd6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202112031943.Twg19fWT-lkp@intel.com>
[adding alsa-devel]
On 12/3/21 5:25 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 7afeac307a9561e3a93682c1e7eb22f918aa1187
> commit: 046aede2f847676f93a2ea4f48b77909c51dba40 [3956/5128] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Retry codec probing if it fails
> config: i386-randconfig-r033-20211202 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211203/202112031943.Twg19fWT-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4b553297ef3ee4dc2119d5429adf3072e90fac38)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=046aede2f847676f93a2ea4f48b77909c51dba40
> git remote add linux-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> git fetch --no-tags linux-next master
> git checkout 046aede2f847676f93a2ea4f48b77909c51dba40
> # save the config file to linux build tree
> mkdir build_dir
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c:132:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES'
> } while (resp == -1 && retry++ < CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES);
> ^
> 1 error generated.
>
>
> vim +/CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES +132 sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c
>
> 110
> 111 /* probe individual codec */
> 112 static int hda_codec_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, int address,
> 113 bool hda_codec_use_common_hdmi)
> 114 {
> 115 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_HDA_AUDIO_CODEC)
> 116 struct hdac_hda_priv *hda_priv;
> 117 struct hda_codec *codec;
> 118 int type = HDA_DEV_LEGACY;
> 119 #endif
> 120 struct hda_bus *hbus = sof_to_hbus(sdev);
> 121 struct hdac_device *hdev;
> 122 u32 hda_cmd = (address << 28) | (AC_NODE_ROOT << 20) |
> 123 (AC_VERB_PARAMETERS << 8) | AC_PAR_VENDOR_ID;
> 124 u32 resp = -1;
> 125 int ret, retry = 0;
> 126
> 127 do {
> 128 mutex_lock(&hbus->core.cmd_mutex);
> 129 snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd(&hbus->core, hda_cmd);
> 130 snd_hdac_bus_get_response(&hbus->core, address, &resp);
> 131 mutex_unlock(&hbus->core.cmd_mutex);
> > 132 } while (resp == -1 && retry++ < CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES);
Indeed, something's not right here.
CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES is defined conditionally
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_HDA_AUDIO_CODEC)
#define IDISP_VID_INTEL 0x80860000
#define CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES 3
but it's used unconditionally.
We could define this constant unconditionally as a quick fix, but this
compilation problem might expose a larger problem.
Kai, I wonder if this is code from lines 120 to 139 that we didn't
update when we moved to support HDMI with the generic HDaudio parts? I
don't see why we could even try to send a command on the bus is there's
no audio codec support?
hda_codec_use_common_hdmi should be the default assumption now, I don't
think we support the old solution, do we?
> 133
> 134 if (resp == -1)
> 135 return -EIO;
> 136 dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "HDA codec #%d probed OK: response: %x\n",
> 137 address, resp);
> 138
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 11:25 kernel test robot
2021-12-03 14:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2021-12-03 14:07 ` Kai Vehmanen
2021-12-03 14:48 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-12-03 15:01 ` Hui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a93302d2-d76f-95a2-2a7c-bcf34db7bfd6@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox