From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from process_madvise()
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:55:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a89c68fc-23e0-4cef-b7db-4d118b365e92@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yp26taqjxput2k5w6jekhnexbp2isqdksckrv2jjxomxswjh6g@f57mxzd62fyt>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> * SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> [250116 20:31]:
> > process_madvise() calls do_madvise() for each address range. Then, each
> > do_madvise() invocation holds and releases same mmap_lock. Optimize the
> > redundant lock operations by splitting do_madvise() internal logics
> > including the mmap_lock operations, and calling the small logics
> > directly from process_madvise() in a sequence that removes the redundant
> > locking.
> >
> > Changes from RFC v1 (20250111004618.1566-1-sj@kernel.org)
> > - Split out do_madvise() and use those from vector_madvise(), instead of
> > adding a flag to do_madvise() (Liam R. Howlett)
>
> I was waiting for a non-RFC to re-examine the series. It looks like a
> good clean up.
>
> Do you think you'll send out a non-RFC version soon?
This is definitely a great cleanup, there's a problem with patch 3/3, but
SJ - feel free to un-RFC with the fix I suggested - and then happy to give
R-b and T-b tags!
Thanks for doing this!
Cheers, Lorenzo
>
> >
> > SeongJae Park (4):
> > mm/madvise: split out mmap locking operations for madvise()
> > mm/madvise: split out madvise input validity check
> > mm/madvise: split out madvise() behavior execution
> > mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from
> > process_madvise()
> >
> > mm/madvise.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: b43ba6938d01ad4487028592109d4116a28b7afa
> > --
> > 2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 1:30 SeongJae Park
2025-01-17 1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] mm/madvise: split out mmap locking operations for madvise() SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 15:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-17 1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] mm/madvise: split out madvise input validity check SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 19:19 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-17 1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] mm/madvise: split out madvise() behavior execution SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:19 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-17 1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from process_madvise() SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:20 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-31 17:47 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-01-31 17:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-02-04 19:53 ` SeongJae Park
2025-02-06 6:28 ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-17 19:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 18:25 ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 19:17 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-04 18:56 ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] " Shakeel Butt
2025-01-29 21:09 ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 16:04 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-01-31 16:30 ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 16:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-01-31 17:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a89c68fc-23e0-4cef-b7db-4d118b365e92@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox