linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from process_madvise()
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:55:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a89c68fc-23e0-4cef-b7db-4d118b365e92@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yp26taqjxput2k5w6jekhnexbp2isqdksckrv2jjxomxswjh6g@f57mxzd62fyt>

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> * SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> [250116 20:31]:
> > process_madvise() calls do_madvise() for each address range.  Then, each
> > do_madvise() invocation holds and releases same mmap_lock.  Optimize the
> > redundant lock operations by splitting do_madvise() internal logics
> > including the mmap_lock operations, and calling the small logics
> > directly from process_madvise() in a sequence that removes the redundant
> > locking.
> >
> > Changes from RFC v1 (20250111004618.1566-1-sj@kernel.org)
> > - Split out do_madvise() and use those from vector_madvise(), instead of
> >   adding a flag to do_madvise() (Liam R. Howlett)
>
> I was waiting for a non-RFC to re-examine the series.  It looks like a
> good clean up.
>
> Do you think you'll send out a non-RFC version soon?

This is definitely a great cleanup, there's a problem with patch 3/3, but
SJ - feel free to un-RFC with the fix I suggested - and then happy to give
R-b and T-b tags!

Thanks for doing this!

Cheers, Lorenzo

>
> >
> > SeongJae Park (4):
> >   mm/madvise: split out mmap locking operations for madvise()
> >   mm/madvise: split out madvise input validity check
> >   mm/madvise: split out madvise() behavior execution
> >   mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from
> >     process_madvise()
> >
> >  mm/madvise.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: b43ba6938d01ad4487028592109d4116a28b7afa
> > --
> > 2.39.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-31 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-17  1:30 SeongJae Park
2025-01-17  1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] mm/madvise: split out mmap locking operations for madvise() SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:18   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 15:58   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:33   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-17  1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] mm/madvise: split out madvise input validity check SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:18   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:01   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 19:19   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-17  1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] mm/madvise: split out madvise() behavior execution SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:19   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:10   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-17  1:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from process_madvise() SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:20   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-01-31 16:53   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:31     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-01-31 17:47       ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-01-31 17:51         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-31 17:58           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-02-04 19:53           ` SeongJae Park
2025-02-06  6:28             ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-17 19:28           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 18:25             ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 19:17         ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-04 18:56     ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-29 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] " Shakeel Butt
2025-01-29 21:09   ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 16:04 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-01-31 16:30   ` SeongJae Park
2025-01-31 16:55   ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-01-31 17:53     ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a89c68fc-23e0-4cef-b7db-4d118b365e92@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox