From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
'Vlastimil Babka' <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove all the slab allocators
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 18:45:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a84e8534-ef49-c33f-711c-fa5b9ee88269@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eea7e17ab4264b7ca7ccea0ab725120f@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Le 01/04/2023 à 20:33, David Laight a écrit :
> From: Vlastimil Babka
>> Sent: 32 March 2023 10:47
>>
>> As the SLOB removal is on track and the SLAB removal is planned, I have
>> realized - why should we stop there and not remove also SLUB? What's a
>> slab allocator good for in 2023? The RAM sizes are getting larger and
>> the modules cheaper [1]. The object constructor trick was perhaps
>> interesting in 1994, but not with contemporary CPUs. So all the slab
>> allocator does today is just adding an unnecessary layer of complexity
>> over the page allocator.
>
> Why stop there?
> Remove kmalloc() completely.
> With cheap memory isn't unreasonable to go back to compile-time
> settable fixed size arrays for all items.
> Should make 'use after free' much easier to track down.
>
While at it, why not also increase the page size to hugepage size, that
would allow us to remove all the complex THP logic, and would remove one
level of page tables. I would also reduce TLB pressure.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-01 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-01 9:46 Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-01 10:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-04-01 10:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-04-01 11:33 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-04-01 11:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-01 15:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-01 18:33 ` David Laight
2023-04-01 18:45 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2023-04-01 22:04 ` David Laight
2023-04-02 5:09 ` Jeff Xie
2023-04-02 9:09 ` 郭辉
2023-04-02 11:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-03 3:51 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-04-03 4:04 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-04-03 4:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a84e8534-ef49-c33f-711c-fa5b9ee88269@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox