From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A457C64E8A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFF3221FF for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:11:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EFF3221FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=physik.fu-berlin.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 941CA6B005D; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:11:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8F4848D0002; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:11:05 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8072E8D0001; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:11:05 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0139.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.139]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6246B005D for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:11:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344BA87F8 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:11:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77544144090.15.mark20_31171bf273a9 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122161814B0C7 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:11:05 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: mark20_31171bf273a9 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3448 Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by imf43.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.94) with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from ) id 1kk1gY-003MrK-Et; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:10:58 +0100 Received: from p57bd9091.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.189.144.145] helo=[192.168.178.139]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.94) with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (envelope-from ) id 1kk1gX-000Ce2-UF; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:10:58 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] arch, mm: deprecate DISCONTIGMEM To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , Catalin Marinas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Turner , Meelis Roos , Michael Schmitz , Mike Rapoport , Russell King , Tony Luck , Vineet Gupta , Will Deacon , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org References: <20201101170454.9567-1-rppt@kernel.org> <43c53597-6267-bdc2-a975-0aab5daa0d37@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20201117062316.GB370813@kernel.org> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:10:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117062316.GB370813@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Sender: glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de X-Originating-IP: 87.189.144.145 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Mike! On 11/17/20 7:23 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: >> Apologies for the late reply. Is this still relevant for testing? >> >> I have already successfully tested v1 of the patch set, shall I test v2? > > There were minor differences only for m68k between the versions. I've > verified them on ARAnyM but if you have a real machine a run there would > be nice. I have just built a fresh kernel from the tip of Linus' tree and it boots fine on my RX-2600: root@glendronach:~# uname -a Linux glendronach 5.10.0-rc6 #6 SMP Tue Dec 1 04:52:49 CET 2020 ia64 GNU/Linux root@glendronach:~# No issues observed so far. Looking at the git log, it seems these changes haven't been merged for 5.10 yet. I assume they will be coming with 5.11? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913