From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: list_lru: introduce caller locking for additions and deletions
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:55:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7cbe907-b8dc-4181-8dcb-a0986a09f1a6@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318200352.1039011-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:53:23PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Locking is currently internal to the list_lru API. However, a caller
> might want to keep auxiliary state synchronized with the LRU state.
>
> For example, the THP shrinker uses the lock of its custom LRU to keep
> PG_partially_mapped and vmstats consistent.
>
> To allow the THP shrinker to switch to list_lru, provide normal and
> irqsafe locking primitives as well as caller-locked variants of the
> addition and deletion functions.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Had a good look through the logic, went to write comments more than once then
realised I didn't need to, so LGTM and:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/list_lru.h | 34 +++++++++++++
> mm/list_lru.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> index fe739d35a864..4afc02deb44d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,40 @@ int memcg_list_lru_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct list_lru *lru,
> gfp_t gfp);
> void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent);
>
> +/**
> + * list_lru_lock: lock the sublist for the given node and memcg
> + * @lru: the lru pointer
> + * @nid: the node id of the sublist to lock.
> + * @memcg: the cgroup of the sublist to lock.
> + *
> + * Returns the locked list_lru_one sublist. The caller must call
> + * list_lru_unlock() when done.
> + *
> + * You must ensure that the memcg is not freed during this call (e.g., with
> + * rcu or by taking a css refcnt).
> + *
> + * Return: the locked list_lru_one, or NULL on failure
> + */
> +struct list_lru_one *list_lru_lock(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +
> +/**
> + * list_lru_unlock: unlock a sublist locked by list_lru_lock()
> + * @l: the list_lru_one to unlock
> + */
> +void list_lru_unlock(struct list_lru_one *l);
> +
> +struct list_lru_one *list_lru_lock_irqsave(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *irq_flags);
> +void list_lru_unlock_irqrestore(struct list_lru_one *l,
> + unsigned long *irq_flags);
> +
> +/* Caller-locked variants, see list_lru_add() etc for documentation */
> +bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l,
> + struct list_head *item, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l,
> + struct list_head *item, int nid);
> +
> /**
> * list_lru_add: add an element to the lru list's tail
> * @lru: the lru pointer
> diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
> index 4d74c2e9c2a5..b817c0f48f73 100644
> --- a/mm/list_lru.c
> +++ b/mm/list_lru.c
> @@ -15,17 +15,23 @@
> #include "slab.h"
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -static inline void lock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq)
> +static inline void lock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq,
> + unsigned long *irq_flags)
> {
> - if (irq)
> + if (irq_flags)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, *irq_flags);
> + else if (irq)
> spin_lock_irq(&l->lock);
> else
> spin_lock(&l->lock);
> }
>
> -static inline void unlock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq_off)
> +static inline void unlock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq_off,
> + unsigned long *irq_flags)
> {
> - if (irq_off)
> + if (irq_flags)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, *irq_flags);
> + else if (irq_off)
> spin_unlock_irq(&l->lock);
> else
> spin_unlock(&l->lock);
> @@ -78,7 +84,7 @@ list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int idx)
>
> static inline struct list_lru_one *
> lock_list_lru_of_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> - bool irq, bool skip_empty)
> + bool irq, unsigned long *irq_flags, bool skip_empty)
> {
> struct list_lru_one *l;
>
> @@ -86,12 +92,12 @@ lock_list_lru_of_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> again:
> l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
> if (likely(l)) {
> - lock_list_lru(l, irq);
> + lock_list_lru(l, irq, irq_flags);
> if (likely(READ_ONCE(l->nr_items) != LONG_MIN)) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return l;
> }
> - unlock_list_lru(l, irq);
> + unlock_list_lru(l, irq, irq_flags);
> }
> /*
> * Caller may simply bail out if raced with reparenting or
> @@ -132,37 +138,81 @@ list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int idx)
>
> static inline struct list_lru_one *
> lock_list_lru_of_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> - bool irq, bool skip_empty)
> + bool irq, unsigned long *irq_flags, bool skip_empty)
> {
> struct list_lru_one *l = &lru->node[nid].lru;
>
> - lock_list_lru(l, irq);
> + lock_list_lru(l, irq, irq_flags);
>
> return l;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
>
> -/* The caller must ensure the memcg lifetime. */
> -bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +struct list_lru_one *list_lru_lock(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> - struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
> - struct list_lru_one *l;
> + return lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, /*irq=*/false,
> + /*irq_flags=*/NULL, /*skip_empty=*/false);
> +}
> +
> +void list_lru_unlock(struct list_lru_one *l)
> +{
> + unlock_list_lru(l, /*irq_off=*/false, /*irq_flags=*/NULL);
> +}
> +
> +struct list_lru_one *list_lru_lock_irqsave(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + return lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, /*irq=*/true,
> + /*irq_flags=*/flags, /*skip_empty=*/false);
> +}
> +
> +void list_lru_unlock_irqrestore(struct list_lru_one *l, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + unlock_list_lru(l, /*irq_off=*/true, /*irq_flags=*/flags);
> +}
>
> - l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, false, false);
> +bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l,
> + struct list_head *item, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> if (list_empty(item)) {
> list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
> /* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
> if (!l->nr_items++)
> set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
> - unlock_list_lru(l, false);
> - atomic_long_inc(&nlru->nr_items);
> + atomic_long_inc(&lru->node[nid].nr_items);
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l,
> + struct list_head *item, int nid)
> +{
> + if (!list_empty(item)) {
> + list_del_init(item);
> + l->nr_items--;
> + atomic_long_dec(&lru->node[nid].nr_items);
> return true;
> }
> - unlock_list_lru(l, false);
> return false;
> }
>
> +/* The caller must ensure the memcg lifetime. */
> +bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct list_lru_one *l;
> + bool ret;
> +
> + l = list_lru_lock(lru, nid, memcg);
> + ret = __list_lru_add(lru, l, item, nid, memcg);
> + list_lru_unlock(l);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> bool list_lru_add_obj(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> {
> bool ret;
> @@ -184,19 +234,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add_obj);
> bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> - struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
> struct list_lru_one *l;
> + bool ret;
>
> - l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, false, false);
> - if (!list_empty(item)) {
> - list_del_init(item);
> - l->nr_items--;
> - unlock_list_lru(l, false);
> - atomic_long_dec(&nlru->nr_items);
> - return true;
> - }
> - unlock_list_lru(l, false);
> - return false;
> + l = list_lru_lock(lru, nid, memcg);
> + ret = __list_lru_del(lru, l, item, nid);
> + list_lru_unlock(l);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> bool list_lru_del_obj(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> @@ -269,7 +313,8 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long isolated = 0;
>
> restart:
> - l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, irq_off, true);
> + l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, /*irq=*/irq_off,
> + /*irq_flags=*/NULL, /*skip_empty=*/true);
> if (!l)
> return isolated;
> list_for_each_safe(item, n, &l->list) {
> @@ -310,7 +355,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> BUG();
> }
> }
> - unlock_list_lru(l, irq_off);
> + unlock_list_lru(l, irq_off, NULL);
> out:
> return isolated;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 19:53 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: switch THP shrinker to list_lru Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: list_lru: lock_list_lru_of_memcg() cannot return NULL if !skip_empty Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:12 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-24 11:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: list_lru: deduplicate unlock_list_lru() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-24 11:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: list_lru: move list dead check to lock_list_lru_of_memcg() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:20 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-24 11:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm: list_lru: deduplicate lock_list_lru() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-24 11:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: list_lru: introduce caller locking for additions and deletions Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-20 16:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-24 11:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) [this message]
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: list_lru: introduce folio_memcg_list_lru_alloc() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-18 21:01 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-24 12:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-30 16:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-01 14:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm: switch deferred split shrinker to list_lru Johannes Weiner
2026-03-18 20:26 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-18 23:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-24 13:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-30 16:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-01 17:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-06 21:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-07 9:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-27 7:51 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-30 16:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-30 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm: switch deferred split shrinker to list_lru - [s390] panic in __memcg_list_lru_alloc Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-03-30 19:03 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-30 20:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-30 20:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-30 22:46 ` Vasily Gorbik
2026-03-31 8:04 ` Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-03-18 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: switch THP shrinker to list_lru Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-18 22:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-19 8:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-19 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-19 11:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7cbe907-b8dc-4181-8dcb-a0986a09f1a6@lucifer.local \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox