linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: lipeifeng@oppo.com, peifengl55@gmail.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: support multi_freearea to the reduction of external fragmentation
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:06:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7bb16c0-31b2-6aa5-2186-8c957955649e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414023803.937-1-lipeifeng@oppo.com>

On 4/14/21 4:38 AM, lipeifeng@oppo.com wrote:
> From: lipeifeng <lipeifeng@oppo.com>
> 
> This patch would "sort" the free-pages in buddy by pages-PFN to concentrate
> low-order-pages allocation in the front area of memory and high-order-pages
> allcation on the contrary so that few memory-pollution in the back area of
> memory and the probablity of high-order-pages allocation would be increased
> significantly.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   1) Divide memory into several segments by pages-PFN
>      "Multi_freearea" would divide memory into FREE_AREA_COUNTS segments
>      by pages-PFN,each memory-segment corresponds to a free_area.
> 
>      Example: machine(4G of physical memery) and FREE_AREA_COUNTS(4):
>         page-PFN:0x0     0x40000(1G)   0x80000(2G)  0xc0000(3G) 0xFFFFF(4G)
>                  |------------|--------------|--------------|-------------|
>         free_area:  [0][]           [1][]           [2][]        [3][]
> 
>      NOTE: Selecting the corresponding freearea when pages are freed back
> 	       to buddy:
>         - pages-PFN[0, free_area_segment[0].max_pfn] -> free_area[0][]
>         - pages-PFN[free_area_segment[flc - 1].max_pfn,
> 	            free_area_segment[flc].max_pfn] -> free_area[flc][]
>                    (flc > 0)
> 
>      By this way, all pages in the same segment/free_area is within a
>      certain range of pages-PFN.
> 
>   2) Select the corresponding freearea to alloc-pages
>      "Multi_freearea" would select the corresponding free_area by the
>      allocation-order when alloc-pages.
>         - order <  HIGH_ORDER_TO_FLC:
> 	        free_area[0] -> ... -> free_area[FREE_AREA_COUNTS - 1]
>         - order >= HIGH_ORDER_TO_FLC:
> 	        free_area[FREE_AREA_COUNTS - 1] -> ... -> free_area[0]
> 
>      Example:
>         The machine(4G of physical memery) and FREE_AREA_COUNTS(4)
>         and HIGH_ORDER_TO_FLC(3).
> 	If user allocs page(order = 0),it would take page from
> 	free_area[0][] first, if that fails,try free_area[1][] and so on.
> 	If user allocs page(order = 4),it would take page from
> 	free_area[3][] first, if that fails,try free_area[2][] and so on.
> 
>      By this way,low-order pages will be concentrated in the front area
>      of memory.Because of few memory-pollution in the back area of memory,
>      the sussessful probablity of high-order allocation would be improved.
> 
>   3) Adjust the location of free-pages in the free_list
>      "Multi_freearea" would place free-pages in the head of free_list if
>      pages-PFN is smaller than free_area_segment[flc]->median_pfn and in
>      the tail of free_list on the contrary.
> 
>      Example:
>         page-PFN:        free_area_segment[flc]->median_pfn
>                                         |
>         free_list: page->page->page->...|...page->page->page
>         pages-PFN:|   < median_pfn      |  >= median_pfn    |
> 
>      Because it would take pages from the head of the freelist first in
>      buddy system,the free-pages in the tail are more likely to keep in the
>      buddy system.The closer the PFN of pages kept in buddy system, the
>      greater the probablity of merging that into high-order pages.

I think this part 3) would be worth to be tried separately first, as it's not a
big change compared to the other ones.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-14  2:38 lipeifeng
2021-04-16 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-04-19  2:37   ` lipeifeng
2021-04-22  9:37     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-22  9:29   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-26  3:19     ` lipeifeng
2021-04-26  8:37       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-26 10:19         ` lipeifeng
2021-04-27 12:46           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-28  4:03             ` lipeifeng
2021-04-28  9:04               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-28 10:53                 ` lipeifeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7bb16c0-31b2-6aa5-2186-8c957955649e@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipeifeng@oppo.com \
    --cc=peifengl55@gmail.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox