On 2022/7/21 23:58, Abhishek Shah wrote: > Dear Kernel Maintainers, > > We found a race in mm/ksm.c. During the execution of the function > /__ksm_run/ which uses variable /ksm_run/ to decide the list insertion > point, the variable /ksm_run/ can be concurrently modified in the > function /run_store/, which we thought could be undesirable since “KSM > pages in newly forked mms can be missed” (See comment here: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc5/source/mm/ksm.c#L2498 > ). > We would also like your thoughts on the security impact given it is a > TOCTOU bug. > > We provide more details below including the trace and reproducing > test cases. Hello, could the following changes to avoid the data-race issue? diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c index 54f78c9eecae..f072753cbb3a 100644 --- a/mm/ksm.c +++ b/mm/ksm.c @@ -2497,6 +2497,7 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)  {         struct mm_slot *mm_slot;         int needs_wakeup; +       bool ksm_run_merge;         mm_slot = alloc_mm_slot();         if (!mm_slot) @@ -2505,6 +2506,10 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)         /* Check ksm_run too?  Would need tighter locking */         needs_wakeup = list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.mm_list); +       mutex_lock(&ksm_thread_mutex); +       ksm_run_unmerge = !!(ksm_run & KSM_RUN_UNMERGE); +       mutex_unlock(&ksm_thread_mutex); +         spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);         insert_to_mm_slots_hash(mm, mm_slot);         /* @@ -2517,7 +2522,7 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)          * scanning cursor, otherwise KSM pages in newly forked mms will be          * missed: then we might as well insert at the end of the list.          */ -       if (ksm_run & KSM_RUN_UNMERGE) +       if (ksm_run_unmerge)                 list_add_tail(&mm_slot->mm_list, &ksm_mm_head.mm_list);         else                 list_add_tail(&mm_slot->mm_list, &ksm_scan.mm_slot->mm_list); > > > *Trace* > BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __ksm_enter / run_store > write to 0xffffffff881edae0 of 8 bytes by task 6542 on cpu 0: >  run_store+0x19a/0x2d0 mm/ksm.c:2897 >  kobj_attr_store+0x44/0x60 lib/kobject.c:824 >  sysfs_kf_write+0x16f/0x1a0 fs/sysfs/file.c:136 >  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2ae/0x370 fs/kernfs/file.c:291 >  call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2050 [inline] >  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:504 [inline] >  vfs_write+0x779/0x900 fs/read_write.c:591 >  ksys_write+0xde/0x190 fs/read_write.c:644 >  __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:656 [inline] >  __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:653 [inline] >  __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 fs/read_write.c:653 >  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] >  do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > read to 0xffffffff881edae0 of 8 bytes by task 6541 on cpu 1: >  __ksm_enter+0x114/0x260 mm/ksm.c:2501 >  ksm_madvise+0x291/0x350 mm/ksm.c:2451 >  madvise_vma_behavior mm/madvise.c:1039 [inline] >  madvise_walk_vmas mm/madvise.c:1221 [inline] >  do_madvise+0x656/0xeb0 mm/madvise.c:1399 >  __do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1412 [inline] >  __se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1410 [inline] >  __x64_sys_madvise+0x64/0x70 mm/madvise.c:1410 >  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] >  do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: > CPU: 1 PID: 6541 Comm: syz-executor2-n Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5+ #107 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 > 04/01/2014 > --------------------- > *Inputs * > Input CPU 0: > r0 = openat$sysctl(0xffffff9c, > &(0x7f0000000100)='/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run\x00', 0x1, 0x0) > write$sysctl(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)='2\x00', 0x2) > > Input CPU 1: > madvise(&(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000, 0xc) > mlock2(&(0x7f0000ffe000/0x2000)=nil, 0x2000, 0x0) > madvise(&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x12) > clone(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)