From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
osalvador@suse.de, liuzixing@hygon.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: wait for hugepage folios to be freed
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:54:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a78dcef7-b9bf-46a7-b786-43c77015c72a@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <048ca765-bf44-46ab-87d4-328dc0979159@redhat.com>
在 2025/2/18 17:41, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 18.02.25 10:22, Ge Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2025/2/18 16:55, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> On 15.02.25 06:50, Ge Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2025/2/14 16:08, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>>>> On 14.02.25 07:32, yangge1116@126.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since the introduction of commit b65d4adbc0f0 ("mm: hugetlb: defer
>>>>>> freeing
>>>>>> of HugeTLB pages"), which supports deferring the freeing of HugeTLB
>>>>>> pages,
>>>>>> the allocation of contiguous memory through cma_alloc() may fail
>>>>>> probabilistically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the CMA allocation process, if it is found that the CMA area is
>>>>>> occupied
>>>>>> by in-use hugepage folios, these in-use hugepage folios need to be
>>>>>> migrated
>>>>>> to another location. When there are no available hugepage folios
>>>>>> in the
>>>>>> free HugeTLB pool during the migration of in-use HugeTLB pages, new
>>>>>> folios
>>>>>> are allocated from the buddy system. A temporary state is set on the
>>>>>> newly
>>>>>> allocated folio. Upon completion of the hugepage folio migration, the
>>>>>> temporary state is transferred from the new folios to the old folios.
>>>>>> Normally, when the old folios with the temporary state are freed,
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> directly released back to the buddy system. However, due to the
>>>>>> deferred
>>>>>> freeing of HugeTLB pages, the PageBuddy() check fails, ultimately
>>>>>> leading
>>>>>> to the failure of cma_alloc().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is a simplified call trace illustrating the process:
>>>>>> cma_alloc()
>>>>>> ->__alloc_contig_migrate_range() // Migrate in-use hugepage
>>>>>> ->unmap_and_move_huge_page()
>>>>>> ->folio_putback_hugetlb() // Free old folios
>>>>>> ->test_pages_isolated()
>>>>>> ->__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock()
>>>>>> ->PageBuddy(page) // Check if the page is in buddy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To resolve this issue, we have implemented a function named
>>>>>> wait_for_hugepage_folios_freed(). This function ensures that the
>>>>>> hugepage
>>>>>> folios are properly released back to the buddy system after their
>>>>>> migration
>>>>>> is completed. By invoking wait_for_hugepage_folios_freed() following
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> migration process, we guarantee that when test_pages_isolated() is
>>>>>> executed, it will successfully pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, so after every successful migration -> put of src, we wait
>>>>> for the
>>>>> src to actually get freed.
>>>>>
>>>>> When migrating multiple hugetlb folios, we'd wait once per folio.
>>>>>
>>>>> It reminds me a bit about pcp caches, where folios are !buddy until
>>>>> the
>>>>> pcp was drained.
>>>>>
>>>> It seems that we only track unmovable, reclaimable, and movable
>>>> pages on
>>>> the pcp lists. For specific details, please refer to the
>>>> free_frozen_pages() function.
>>>
>>> It reminded me about PCP caches, because we effectively also have to
>>> wait for some stuck folios to properly get freed to the buddy.
>>>
>> It seems that when an isolated page is freed, it won't be placed back
>> into the PCP caches.
>
> I recall there are cases when the page was in the pcp before the
> isolation started, which is why we drain the pcp at some point (IIRC).
>
Yes, indeed, drain_all_pages(cc.zone) is currently executed before
__alloc_contig_migrate_range().
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 6:32 yangge1116
2025-02-14 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-15 5:50 ` Ge Yang
2025-02-18 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-18 9:22 ` Ge Yang
2025-02-18 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-18 9:54 ` Ge Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a78dcef7-b9bf-46a7-b786-43c77015c72a@126.com \
--to=yangge1116@126.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuzixing@hygon.cn \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox