linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@readmodwrite.com>, willy@infradead.org
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	luka.2016.cs@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential Linux Crash: WARNING in ext4_dirty_folio in Linux kernel v6.13-rc5
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:58:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a751498e-0bde-4114-a9f3-9d3c755d8835@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAENh_SSbkoa3srjkAMmJuf-iTFxHOtwESHoXiPAu6bO7MLOkDA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/3/25 14:29, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:59 AM Matt Fleming <matt@readmodwrite.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,

+ Cc also Michal

>> I'm also seeing this PF_MEMALLOC WARN triggered from kswapd in 6.12.19.

We're talking about __alloc_pages_slowpath() doing WARN_ON_ONCE(current-
>flags & PF_MEMALLOC); for __GFP_NOFAIL allocations.

kswapd() sets:

tsk->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_KSWAPD;

so any __GFP_NOFAIL allocation done in the kswapd context risks this
warning. It's also objectively bad IMHO because for direct reclaim we can
loop and hope kswapd rescues us, but kswapd would then have to rely on
direct reclaimers to get unstuck. I don't see an easy generic solution?

>> Does overlayfs need some kind of background inode reclaim support?
> 
> Hey everyone, I know there was some off-list discussion last week at
> LSFMM, but I don't think a definite solution has been proposed for the
> below stacktrace.
> 
> What is the shrinker API policy wrt memory allocation and I/O? Should
> overlayfs do something more like XFS and background reclaim to avoid
> GFP_NOFAIL
> allocations when kswapd is shrinking caches?
> 
>>   Call Trace:
>>    <TASK>
>>    __alloc_pages_noprof+0x31c/0x330
>>    alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0xe3/0x1d0
>>    folio_alloc_noprof+0x5b/0xa0
>>    __filemap_get_folio+0x1f3/0x380
>>    __getblk_slow+0xa3/0x1e0
>>    __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x121/0x4b0
>>    ext4_get_inode_loc+0x40/0xa0
>>    ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x39/0xc0
>>    __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x5b/0x220
>>    ext4_evict_inode+0x26d/0x690
>>    evict+0x112/0x2a0
>>    __dentry_kill+0x71/0x180
>>    dput+0xeb/0x1b0
>>    ovl_stack_put+0x2e/0x50 [overlay]
>>    ovl_destroy_inode+0x3a/0x60 [overlay]
>>    destroy_inode+0x3b/0x70
>>    __dentry_kill+0x71/0x180
>>    shrink_dentry_list+0x6b/0xe0
>>    prune_dcache_sb+0x56/0x80
>>    super_cache_scan+0x12c/0x1e0
>>    do_shrink_slab+0x13b/0x350
>>    shrink_slab+0x278/0x3a0
>>    shrink_node+0x328/0x880
>>    balance_pgdat+0x36d/0x740
>>    kswapd+0x1f0/0x380
>>    kthread+0xd2/0x100
>>    ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
>>    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>>    </TASK>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-06  2:42 Luka
2025-03-06  5:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-26 10:59   ` Matt Fleming
2025-04-03 12:29     ` Matt Fleming
2025-04-03 12:58       ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-04-03 14:33         ` Michal Hocko
2025-04-03 17:12       ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-03 19:32         ` James Bottomley
2025-04-04  9:09         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-04 13:50           ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-07 23:00         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a751498e-0bde-4114-a9f3-9d3c755d8835@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luka.2016.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=matt@readmodwrite.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox