From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
andrii@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:46:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a74hjevi7tyq36vekcft7mlfdgwtcg6ddvr3bekb3amcf4fiuc@z7xszkyjcrbb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501032718.65476-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:27:18PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,13 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
> if (!val)
> return;
>
> - cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
> + /*
> + * If called from NMI via kmalloc_nolock -> memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook
> + * -> obj_cgroup_charge -> mod_memcg_state,
> + * then delay the update.
> + */
> + if (!in_nmi())
> + cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
I don't think we can just ignore cgroup_rstat_updated() for nmi as there
is a chance (though very small) that we will loose these stats updates.
In addition, memcg_rstat_updated() itself is not reentrant safe along
with couple of functions leading to it like __mod_memcg_lruvec_state().
> statc = this_cpu_ptr(memcg->vmstats_percpu);
> for (; statc; statc = statc->parent) {
> /*
> @@ -2895,7 +2901,7 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
> unsigned long flags;
> bool ret = false;
>
> - local_lock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
> + local_lock_irqsave_check(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
>
> stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
> if (objcg == READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) && stock->nr_bytes >= nr_bytes) {
> @@ -2995,7 +3001,7 @@ static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
>
> - local_lock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
> + local_lock_irqsave_check(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
>
> stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
> if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> @@ -3088,6 +3094,27 @@ static inline size_t obj_full_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
> return s->size + sizeof(struct obj_cgroup *);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Try subtract from nr_charged_bytes without making it negative
> + */
> +static bool obj_cgroup_charge_atomic(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, gfp_t flags, size_t sz)
> +{
> + size_t old = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> + u32 nr_pages = sz >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u32 nr_bytes = sz & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> + if ((ssize_t)(old - sz) >= 0 &&
> + atomic_cmpxchg(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes, old, old - sz) == old)
> + return true;
> +
> + nr_pages++;
> + if (obj_cgroup_charge_pages(objcg, flags, nr_pages))
> + return false;
> +
> + atomic_add(PAGE_SIZE - nr_bytes, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> gfp_t flags, size_t size, void **p)
> {
> @@ -3128,6 +3155,21 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (!gfpflags_allow_spinning(flags)) {
> + if (local_lock_is_locked(&memcg_stock.stock_lock)) {
> + /*
> + * Cannot use
> + * lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> + * since lockdep might not have been informed yet
> + * of lock acquisition.
> + */
> + return obj_cgroup_charge_atomic(objcg, flags,
> + size * obj_full_size(s));
We can not just ignore the stat updates here.
> + } else {
> + lockdep_assert_not_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> + }
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>
> @@ -3162,8 +3204,12 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> void **p, int objects, struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts)
> {
> + bool lock_held = local_lock_is_locked(&memcg_stock.stock_lock);
> size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s);
>
> + if (likely(!lock_held))
> + lockdep_assert_not_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> +
> for (int i = 0; i < objects; i++) {
> struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> unsigned int off;
> @@ -3174,8 +3220,12 @@ void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> continue;
>
> obj_exts[off].objcg = NULL;
> - refill_obj_stock(objcg, obj_size, true, -obj_size,
> - slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
> + if (unlikely(lock_held)) {
> + atomic_add(obj_size, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
objcg->nr_charged_bytes is stats ignorant and the relevant stats need to
be updated before putting stuff into it.
> + } else {
> + refill_obj_stock(objcg, obj_size, true, -obj_size,
> + slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
> + }
> obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
> }
> }
I am actually working on making this whole call chain (i.e.
kmalloc/kmem_cache_alloc to memcg [un]charging) reentrant/nmi safe.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 3:27 [PATCH 0/6] mm: Reentrant kmalloc Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: Rename try_alloc_pages() to alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 8:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/local_lock: Expose dep_map in local_trylock_t Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-06 14:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 13:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 16:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_is_locked() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 14:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 15:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 15:23 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_irqsave_check() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 13:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 14:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 17:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-13 6:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: Allow GFP_ACCOUNT and GFP_COMP to be used in alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 8:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 1:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01 3:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-05 18:46 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-05-06 0:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 1:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 18:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 12:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 0:31 ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-07 2:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 8:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07 2:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-09 1:03 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-24 17:13 ` SLAB_NO_CMPXCHG was:: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-25 11:38 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-26 20:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a74hjevi7tyq36vekcft7mlfdgwtcg6ddvr3bekb3amcf4fiuc@z7xszkyjcrbb \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox