linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	 harry.yoo@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	andrii@kernel.org,  memxor@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org,  rostedt@goodmis.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:46:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a74hjevi7tyq36vekcft7mlfdgwtcg6ddvr3bekb3amcf4fiuc@z7xszkyjcrbb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501032718.65476-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:27:18PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> 
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,13 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
>  	if (!val)
>  		return;
>  
> -	cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
> +	/*
> +	 * If called from NMI via kmalloc_nolock -> memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook
> +	 * -> obj_cgroup_charge -> mod_memcg_state,
> +	 * then delay the update.
> +	 */
> +	if (!in_nmi())
> +		cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);

I don't think we can just ignore cgroup_rstat_updated() for nmi as there
is a chance (though very small) that we will loose these stats updates.

In addition, memcg_rstat_updated() itself is not reentrant safe along
with couple of functions leading to it like __mod_memcg_lruvec_state().

>  	statc = this_cpu_ptr(memcg->vmstats_percpu);
>  	for (; statc; statc = statc->parent) {
>  		/*
> @@ -2895,7 +2901,7 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool ret = false;
>  
> -	local_lock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
> +	local_lock_irqsave_check(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
>  
>  	stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>  	if (objcg == READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) && stock->nr_bytes >= nr_bytes) {
> @@ -2995,7 +3001,7 @@ static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
>  
> -	local_lock_irqsave(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
> +	local_lock_irqsave_check(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
>  
>  	stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>  	if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> @@ -3088,6 +3094,27 @@ static inline size_t obj_full_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  	return s->size + sizeof(struct obj_cgroup *);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Try subtract from nr_charged_bytes without making it negative
> + */
> +static bool obj_cgroup_charge_atomic(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, gfp_t flags, size_t sz)
> +{
> +	size_t old = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> +	u32 nr_pages = sz >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	u32 nr_bytes = sz & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> +	if ((ssize_t)(old - sz) >= 0 &&
> +	    atomic_cmpxchg(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes, old, old - sz) == old)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	nr_pages++;
> +	if (obj_cgroup_charge_pages(objcg, flags, nr_pages))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	atomic_add(PAGE_SIZE - nr_bytes, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  				  gfp_t flags, size_t size, void **p)
>  {
> @@ -3128,6 +3155,21 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  			return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!gfpflags_allow_spinning(flags)) {
> +		if (local_lock_is_locked(&memcg_stock.stock_lock)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Cannot use
> +			 * lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> +			 * since lockdep might not have been informed yet
> +			 * of lock acquisition.
> +			 */
> +			return obj_cgroup_charge_atomic(objcg, flags,
> +							size * obj_full_size(s));

We can not just ignore the stat updates here.

> +		} else {
> +			lockdep_assert_not_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
>  		slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>  
> @@ -3162,8 +3204,12 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>  			    void **p, int objects, struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts)
>  {
> +	bool lock_held = local_lock_is_locked(&memcg_stock.stock_lock);
>  	size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s);
>  
> +	if (likely(!lock_held))
> +		lockdep_assert_not_held(this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock.stock_lock));
> +
>  	for (int i = 0; i < objects; i++) {
>  		struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>  		unsigned int off;
> @@ -3174,8 +3220,12 @@ void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		obj_exts[off].objcg = NULL;
> -		refill_obj_stock(objcg, obj_size, true, -obj_size,
> -				 slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
> +		if (unlikely(lock_held)) {
> +			atomic_add(obj_size, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);

objcg->nr_charged_bytes is stats ignorant and the relevant stats need to
be updated before putting stuff into it.

> +		} else {
> +			refill_obj_stock(objcg, obj_size, true, -obj_size,
> +					 slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
> +		}
>  		obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
>  	}
>  }

I am actually working on making this whole call chain (i.e.
kmalloc/kmem_cache_alloc to memcg [un]charging) reentrant/nmi safe.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-01  3:27 [PATCH 0/6] mm: Reentrant kmalloc Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: Rename try_alloc_pages() to alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06  8:26   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  1:24     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/local_lock: Expose dep_map in local_trylock_t Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-06 14:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  1:25       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 13:26   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 16:46     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_is_locked() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 12:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  1:28     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-12 14:56   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 15:01     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 15:23       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_irqsave_check() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 13:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 14:03   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 17:16     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-13  6:58       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 21:55         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: Allow GFP_ACCOUNT and GFP_COMP to be used in alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06  8:55   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  1:33     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-01  3:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-05 18:46   ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-05-06  0:49     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06  1:24       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06  1:51         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 18:05           ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-06 12:01   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  0:31     ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-07  2:23       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07  8:38       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-07  2:20     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 10:44       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-09  1:03   ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-24 17:13     ` SLAB_NO_CMPXCHG was:: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-25 11:38       ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-26 20:03         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a74hjevi7tyq36vekcft7mlfdgwtcg6ddvr3bekb3amcf4fiuc@z7xszkyjcrbb \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox