From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 16/16] arm64/mm: Defer barriers when updating kernel mappings
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:12:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5d66063-c3a0-46fc-ab88-21ae2448c9f0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bc5527e-16f4-45cc-aced-55b1ace6c143@arm.com>
On 10/02/2025 08:03, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 2/5/25 20:39, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Because the kernel can't tolerate page faults for kernel mappings, when
>> setting a valid, kernel space pte (or pmd/pud/p4d/pgd), it emits a
>> dsb(ishst) to ensure that the store to the pgtable is observed by the
>> table walker immediately. Additionally it emits an isb() to ensure that
>> any already speculatively determined invalid mapping fault gets
>> canceled.>
>> We can improve the performance of vmalloc operations by batching these
>> barriers until the end of a set up entry updates. The newly added
>> arch_update_kernel_mappings_begin() / arch_update_kernel_mappings_end()
>> provide the required hooks.
>>
>> vmalloc improves by up to 30% as a result.
>>
>> Two new TIF_ flags are created; TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE tells us if we
>> are in the batch mode and can therefore defer any barriers until the end
>> of the batch. TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING tells us if barriers are queued to
>> be emited at the end of the batch.
>
> Why cannot this be achieved with a single TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE which is
> set in __begin(), cleared in __end() and saved across a __switch_to().
So unconditionally emit the barriers in _end(), and emit them in __switch_to()
if TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE is set?
I guess if calling _begin() then you are definitely going to be setting at least
1 PTE. So you can definitely emit the barriers unconditionally. I was trying to
protect against the case where you get pre-empted (potentially multiple times)
while in the loop. The TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING flag ensures you only emit the
barriers when you definitely need to. Without it, you would have to emit on
every pre-emption even if no more PTEs got set.
But I suspect this is a premature optimization. Probably it will never occur. So
I'll simplify as you suggest.
Thanks,
Ryan
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 20 +++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index ff358d983583..1ee9b9588502 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -39,6 +39,41 @@
>> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/page_table_check.h>
>> +#include <linux/pgtable_modmask.h>
>> +
>> +static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
>> +{
>> + dsb(ishst);
>> + isb();
>> +}
>
> There are many sequence of these two barriers in this particular header,
> hence probably a good idea to factor this out into a common helper.
> >> +
>> +static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
>> +{
>> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE)) {
>> + if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING))
>> + set_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING);
>> + } else
>> + emit_pte_barriers();
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define arch_update_kernel_mappings_begin arch_update_kernel_mappings_begin
>> +static inline void arch_update_kernel_mappings_begin(unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + set_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define arch_update_kernel_mappings_end arch_update_kernel_mappings_end
>> +static inline void arch_update_kernel_mappings_end(unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end,
>> + pgtbl_mod_mask mask)
>> +{
>> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING))
>> + emit_pte_barriers();
>> +
>> + clear_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING);
>> + clear_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE);
>> +}
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> #define __HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_PMD_TLB_RANGE
>> @@ -323,10 +358,8 @@ static inline void __set_pte_complete(pte_t pte)
>> * Only if the new pte is valid and kernel, otherwise TLB maintenance
>> * or update_mmu_cache() have the necessary barriers.
>> */
>> - if (pte_valid_not_user(pte)) {
>> - dsb(ishst);
>> - isb();
>> - }
>> + if (pte_valid_not_user(pte))
>> + queue_pte_barriers();
>> }
>>
>> static inline void __set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> @@ -791,10 +824,8 @@ static inline void set_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd)
>>
>> WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, pmd);
>>
>> - if (pmd_valid_not_user(pmd)) {
>> - dsb(ishst);
>> - isb();
>> - }
>> + if (pmd_valid_not_user(pmd))
>> + queue_pte_barriers();
>> }
>>
>> static inline void pmd_clear(pmd_t *pmdp)
>> @@ -869,10 +900,8 @@ static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
>>
>> WRITE_ONCE(*pudp, pud);
>>
>> - if (pud_valid_not_user(pud)) {
>> - dsb(ishst);
>> - isb();
>> - }
>> + if (pud_valid_not_user(pud))
>> + queue_pte_barriers();
>> }
>>
>> static inline void pud_clear(pud_t *pudp)
>> @@ -960,10 +989,8 @@ static inline void set_p4d(p4d_t *p4dp, p4d_t p4d)
>>
>> WRITE_ONCE(*p4dp, p4d);
>>
>> - if (p4d_valid_not_user(p4d)) {
>> - dsb(ishst);
>> - isb();
>> - }
>> + if (p4d_valid_not_user(p4d))
>> + queue_pte_barriers();
>> }
>>
>> static inline void p4d_clear(p4d_t *p4dp)
>> @@ -1098,10 +1125,8 @@ static inline void set_pgd(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd)
>>
>> WRITE_ONCE(*pgdp, pgd);
>>
>> - if (pgd_valid_not_user(pgd)) {
>> - dsb(ishst);
>> - isb();
>> - }
>> + if (pgd_valid_not_user(pgd))
>> + queue_pte_barriers();
>> }
>>
>> static inline void pgd_clear(pgd_t *pgdp)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> index 1114c1c3300a..382d2121261e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>> #define TIF_SME_VL_INHERIT 28 /* Inherit SME vl_onexec across exec */
>> #define TIF_KERNEL_FPSTATE 29 /* Task is in a kernel mode FPSIMD section */
>> #define TIF_TSC_SIGSEGV 30 /* SIGSEGV on counter-timer access */
>> +#define TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_ACTIVE 31 /* kernel map update in progress */
>> +#define TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING 32 /* kernel map updated with deferred barriers */
>>
>> #define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
>> #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
>> index 42faebb7b712..1367ec6407d1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -680,10 +680,10 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>> gcs_thread_switch(next);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case
>> - * the thread migrates to a different CPU.
>> - * This full barrier is also required by the membarrier system
>> - * call.
>> + * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case the
>> + * thread migrates to a different CPU. This full barrier is also
>> + * required by the membarrier system call. Additionally it is required
>> + * for TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING, see below.
>> */
>> dsb(ish);
>>
>> @@ -696,6 +696,18 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>> /* avoid expensive SCTLR_EL1 accesses if no change */
>> if (prev->thread.sctlr_user != next->thread.sctlr_user)
>> update_sctlr_el1(next->thread.sctlr_user);
>> + else if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING))) {
>> + /*
>> + * In unlikely event that a kernel map update is on-going when
>> + * preemption occurs, we must emit_pte_barriers() if pending.
>> + * emit_pte_barriers() consists of "dsb(ishst); isb();". The dsb
>> + * is already handled above. The isb() is handled if
>> + * update_sctlr_el1() was called. So only need to emit isb()
>> + * here if it wasn't called.
>> + */
>> + isb();
>> + clear_thread_flag(TIF_KMAP_UPDATE_PENDING);
>> + }
>>
>> /* the actual thread switch */
>> last = cpu_switch_to(prev, next);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 15:09 [PATCH v1 00/16] hugetlb and vmalloc fixes and perf improvements Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 01/16] mm: hugetlb: Add huge page size param to huge_ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 5:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 12:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 02/16] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 6:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 12:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 14:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 03/16] arm64: hugetlb: Fix flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() invalidation level Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 6:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 13:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 4:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 04/16] arm64: hugetlb: Refine tlb maintenance scope Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/16] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 10:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 13:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 06/16] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 11:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 13:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 9:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 15:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 07/16] arm64: hugetlb: Use ___set_ptes() and ___ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 4:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 08/16] arm64/mm: Hoist barriers out of ___set_ptes() loop Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 5:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 16:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 09/16] arm64/mm: Avoid barriers for invalid or userspace mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 8:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:53 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 16:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 10/16] mm/vmalloc: Warn on improper use of vunmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 8:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 6:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 11/16] mm/vmalloc: Gracefully unmap huge ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 9:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/16] arm64/mm: Support huge pte-mapped pages in vmap Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 10:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 11:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 6:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-17 4:33 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 13/16] mm: Don't skip arch_sync_kernel_mappings() in error paths Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 10:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 14/16] mm/vmalloc: Batch arch_sync_kernel_mappings() more efficiently Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 7:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 15/16] mm: Generalize arch_sync_kernel_mappings() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 7:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-10 11:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 5:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 16/16] arm64/mm: Defer barriers when updating kernel mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 8:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-10 11:12 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-02-13 5:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-17 4:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-17 9:40 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v1 00/16] hugetlb and vmalloc fixes and perf improvements Andrew Morton
2025-02-06 11:59 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5d66063-c3a0-46fc-ab88-21ae2448c9f0@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox