From: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, <osalvador@suse.de>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
<zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
<sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: fix call folio_test_large with tail page in do_migrate_range
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:40:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5b00cd8-33a5-6efc-eb07-960ad23617b6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e14d5872-351a-41b1-8717-54faa29b82a7@redhat.com>
在 2025/3/26 3:05, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 25.03.25 04:02, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
>>
>> 在 2025/3/24 21:44, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> On 24.03.25 14:17, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
>>>> We triggered the below BUG:
>>>>
>>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x2
>>>> pfn:0x240402
>>>> head: order:9 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0
>>>> pincount:0
>>>> flags: 0x1ffffe0000000040(head|node=1|zone=3|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
>>>> page_type: f4(hugetlb)
>>>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->compound_head & 1)
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> kernel BUG at ./include/linux/page-flags.h:310!
>>>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>> CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 166 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-dirty #374
>>>> Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>>>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>>> pc : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>>> lr : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>>> Call trace:
>>>> const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58 (P)
>>>> do_migrate_range+0x164/0x720
>>>> offline_pages+0x63c/0x6fc
>>>> memory_subsys_offline+0x190/0x1f4
>>>> device_offline+0xc0/0x13c
>>>> state_store+0x90/0xd8
>>>> dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
>>>> sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54
>>>> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1cc
>>>> vfs_write+0x240/0x378
>>>> ksys_write+0x70/0x108
>>>> __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
>>>> invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c
>>>> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
>>>>
>>>> When allocating a hugetlb folio, between the folio is taken from buddy
>>>> and prep_compound_page() is called, start_isolate_page_range() and
>>>> do_migrate_range() is called. When do_migrate_range() scans the head
>>>> page
>>>> of the hugetlb folio, the compound_head field isn't set, so scans the
>>>> tail page next. And at this time, the compound_head field of tail
>>>> page is
>>>> set, folio_test_large() is called by tail page, thus triggers
>>>> VM_BUG_ON().
>>>>
>>>> To fix it, get folio refcount before calling folio_test_large().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 8135d8926c08 ("mm: memory_hotplug: memory hotremove supports
>>>> thp migration")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 12 +++---------
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> index 16cf9e17077e..f600c26ce5de 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> @@ -1813,21 +1813,15 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long
>>>> start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>>> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>> folio = page_folio(page);
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * No reference or lock is held on the folio, so it might
>>>> - * be modified concurrently (e.g. split). As such,
>>>> - * folio_nr_pages() may read garbage. This is fine as the
>>>> outer
>>>> - * loop will revisit the split folio later.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>>> - pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>>> -
>>>> if (!folio_try_get(folio))
>>>> continue;
>>>> if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
>>>> goto put_folio;
>>>> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>>> + pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>>
>>> Moving that will not make it able to skip the large frozen
>>> (refcount==0, e.g., free hugetlb) folio in the continue/put_folio case
>>> above. Hmmmm ..
>> For free hugetlb, pfn is increased by 1 in each loop. This leads to skip
>> free hugetlb slower.
>
> Yes. But now I realize that we have the same issue with free buddy
> pages already (folio_try_get of each individual page :( ).
>
>>>
>>> We could similarly to dumping folios, snapshot them, so we can read
>>> stable data.
>> extract the code in __dump_page()? But snapshot may lead to
>> do_migrate_range() slower too.
>
> There is a patch series on the list to do that, but it might take a
> while to clean that up. Ideally, we'd also jump over free buddy pages.
> In the future we might have better ways to do that.
>
> I don't consider this change here really important, but if all it
> affects is free hugetlb folios, it's not really worth it to have this
> code around.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> But: I suspect 8135d8926c08 is not the introducing commit. Please
> re-verify.
commit 8135d8926c08 adds PageTransHuge() call, which may lead to VM_BUG_ON if the page is tail page.
Before it, for hugetlb, PageHuge()、compound_head() and compound_order() are called before getting
page ref, PageHuge()、compound_head() allows to pass a tail page, compound_order() will not trigger
trigger VM_BUG_ON for tail page, and only lead to reading garbage data, leading to fail offline, but
it will not trigger any VM_BUG_ON. So I think 8135d8926c08 is the introducing commit.
Thanks.
>
> We should not CC stable.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 13:17 Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-24 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-25 3:02 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-25 13:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-03-25 19:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-26 2:40 ` Jinjiang Tu [this message]
2025-03-26 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-27 11:19 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-28 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-01 16:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-07 7:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-28 13:23 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5b00cd8-33a5-6efc-eb07-960ad23617b6@huawei.com \
--to=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox