From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370A86B68BD for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:09:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id n45so13126883qta.5 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 03:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17si1213294qtt.40.2018.12.03.03.09.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 03:09:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memblock: Anonotate memblock_is_reserved() with __init_memblock. References: From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:09:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Yueyi Li , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mhocko@suse.com" Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On 03.12.18 05:00, Yueyi Li wrote: > Found warning: > > WARNING: EXPORT symbol "gsi_write_channel_scratch" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned. > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e0a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function valid_phys_addr_range() to the function .init.text:memblock_is_reserved() > The function valid_phys_addr_range() references > the function __init memblock_is_reserved(). > This is often because valid_phys_addr_range lacks a __init > annotation or the annotation of memblock_is_reserved is wrong. > > Use __init_memblock instead of __init. > > Signed-off-by: liyueyi > --- > > Changes v2: correct typo in 'warning'. > > mm/memblock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 9a2d5ae..81ae63c 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr > return -1; > } > > -bool __init memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr) > +bool __init_memblock memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr) > { > return memblock_search(&memblock.reserved, addr) != -1; > } > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb