Re: [PATCH v2] memblock: Anonotate memblock_is_reserved() with __init_memblock.

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 03.12.18 05:00, Yueyi Li wrote:
> Found warning:
> 
> WARNING: EXPORT symbol "gsi_write_channel_scratch" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned.
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e0a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function valid_phys_addr_range() to the function .init.text:memblock_is_reserved()
> The function valid_phys_addr_range() references
> the function __init memblock_is_reserved().
> This is often because valid_phys_addr_range lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of memblock_is_reserved is wrong.
> 
> Use __init_memblock instead of __init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liyueyi <liyueyi@live.com>
> ---
> 
>  Changes v2: correct typo in 'warning'.
> 
>  mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 9a2d5ae..81ae63c 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> -bool __init memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr)
> +bool __init_memblock memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr)
>  {
>  	return memblock_search(&memblock.reserved, addr) != -1;
>  }
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb