From: Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Allen Pais <apais@microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [v4] mm: khugepaged: avoid overriding min_free_kbytes set by user
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:10:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a55f1f0b-d26e-3cc3-370f-bd6f50692e34@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922100702.GX12990@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 9/22/2020 3:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 22-09-20 10:07:26, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:07:23PM -0700, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend reposting the patch which adds heuristic for THP (if
>>>> THP is enabled) into the hotplug path, arguing with the consistency and
>>>> surprising results when adding memory decreases the value.
>>>
>>> I hope my reposted patch
>>> ([v3 1/2] mm: khugepaged: recalculate min_free_kbytes after memory hotplug
>>> as expected by khugepaged)
>>> change log is ok:
>>>
>>> When memory is hotplug added or removed the min_free_kbytes must be
>>> recalculated based on what is expected by khugepaged. Currently
>>> after hotplug, min_free_kbytes will be set to a lower default and higher
>>> default set when THP enabled is lost. This change restores min_free_kbytes
>>> as expected for THP consumers.
>>
>> Any scenario when hotremove would result in changing min_free_kbytes?
>
> init_per_zone_wmark_min is called from both online and offline path. But
> I believe the problem is not in the offlining path. A decrease wrt
> previous auto tuned value is to be expected. The primary problem is that
> the hotadding memory after boot (without any user configured value) will
> decrease the value effectively because khugepaged tuning
> (set_recommended_min_free_kbytes) is not called.
Thank you Michal and Kirill.
Vijay
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 6:39 Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-17 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 9:34 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 17:27 ` Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-17 17:52 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 18:16 ` Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-18 5:56 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-21 19:07 ` Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-22 7:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-22 10:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 16:10 ` Vijay Balakrishna [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a55f1f0b-d26e-3cc3-370f-bd6f50692e34@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=vijayb@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apais@microsoft.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox