On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 06:35:22PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote: > > The memcg-v1 was originally planned to be removed, could we skip > > supporting v1? > > You mean not reparenting LRU pages if CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is set? More precisely it should be dynamic !cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) > That may work, But would it make the code actually simpler? (Keeping two versions at multiple places vs transferring local stats at the right moment.) Thanks, Michal