From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux.com,
penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4cb93f8-0ca4-57aa-f395-1b22143a32bd@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170125202533.GA22138@cmpxchg.org>
On 01/25/2017 09:25 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:07:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> A group of Linux kernel hackers reported chasing a bug that resulted
>> from their assumption that SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU provided an existence
>> guarantee, that is, that no block from such a slab would be reallocated
>> during an RCU read-side critical section. Of course, that is not the
>> case. Instead, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU only prevents freeing of an entire
>> slab of blocks.
>>
>> However, there is a phrase for this, namely "type safety". This commit
>> therefore renames SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in order
>> to avoid future instances of this sort of confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This has come up in the past, and it always proved hard to agree on a
> better name for it. But I like SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU the best out of
> all proposals, and it's much more poignant than the current name.
Heh, until I've seen this thread I had the same wrong assumption about the flag,
so it suprised me. Good thing I didn't have a chance to use it wrongly so far :)
"Type safety" in this context seems quite counter-intuitive for me, as I've only
heard it to describe programming languages. But that's fine when the name sounds
so exotic that one has to look up what it does. Much safer than when the meaning
seems obvious, but in fact it's misleading.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 11:07 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 11:12 ` willy
2017-01-18 22:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-19 0:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-01-23 0:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-25 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-01-25 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-25 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-25 22:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-25 23:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-25 20:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-01-25 21:26 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-01-25 22:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4cb93f8-0ca4-57aa-f395-1b22143a32bd@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox