From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f198.google.com (mail-pl1-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D29C6B026C for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:27:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b4-v6so3724276plb.3 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:27:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (smtp.codeaurora.org. [198.145.29.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 63-v6si17001584pfe.182.2018.11.11.22.27.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:27:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:57:17 +0530 From: Arun KS Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reference totalram_pages and managed_pages once per function In-Reply-To: <20181112061337.GG21824@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1542002869-16704-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> <1542002869-16704-2-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> <20181112061337.GG21824@bombadil.infradead.org> Message-ID: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: keescook@chromium.org, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, minchan@kernel.org, getarunks@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vatsa@codeaurora.org Hello Matthew, Thanks for reviewing. On 2018-11-12 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:37:46AM +0530, Arun KS wrote: >> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/mem.c >> @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void) >> >> /* this will put all low memory onto the freelists */ >> memblock_free_all(); >> - max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; >> - max_pfn = totalram_pages; >> + max_pfn = max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; > > We don't normally do "a = b = c". How about: > > max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; > - max_pfn = totalram_pages; > + max_pfn = max_low_pfn; Point taken. Will fix it. > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c >> @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, >> const char __user *buf, >> size_t len, loff_t *ppos) >> { >> ssize_t ret = -EINVAL; >> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; > > Can't we use a better variable name here? Even nr_pages would look > better to me. Looks better. Regards, Arun > >> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c >> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; > > Ditto > >> +++ b/fs/file_table.c >> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; > > ... throughout, I guess.