linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add KUnit test for bprm_stack_limits()
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:16:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3e9b1c2-40c1-45df-9fa2-14ee6a7b3fe2@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240520021615.741800-1-keescook@chromium.org>

Hi,

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 07:16:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Since bprm_stack_limits() operates with very limited side-effects, add
> it as the first exec.c KUnit test. Add to Kconfig and adjust MAINTAINERS
> file to include it.
> 
> Tested on 64-bit UML:
> $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run exec
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> ---
...
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
...
> +	  .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3) + sizeof(void *) },
> +	{ { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 4 * (_STK_LIM / 4 *  + sizeof(void *)),
                                                                   ^^^^^^

Google's experimental AI review agent tagged the above change as syntactically wrong.
How does this even compile ?

Thanks,
Guenter


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240520021337.work.198-kees@kernel.org>
2024-05-20  2:16 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-20 14:13   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-20 15:17   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-16 19:16   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2026-03-18 18:33     ` Kees Cook
2026-03-18 19:50       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-20  2:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: Avoid pathological argc, envc, and bprm->p values Kees Cook
     [not found]   ` <fbc4e2e4-3ca2-45b7-8443-0a8372d4ba94@roeck-us.net>
2024-06-21  7:00     ` Kees Cook
2024-06-21 13:21       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-21 19:54         ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3e9b1c2-40c1-45df-9fa2-14ee6a7b3fe2@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox