From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF0AC433EF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B752A8D0003; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B23AC8D0001; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9EC888D0003; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0232.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.232]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AB28D0001 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493BA8249980 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:07:48 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79247555016.25.438FEAD Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5AD1A0003 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:07:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647371267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fBJf1R7kBM9gH+xhtNa/kOhtVdAYjEafv1mIR3CkHEI=; b=a02ENoeAkU4H1SxZNuyf7cP0Rqd3nz3Nz1EWmF8nCz3aleTwmNLpN8V2YdlMaWeXn7zqb/ A+Fc/A+yBoU8P3SS1WOTK41LK2/DV6UzTa54p4+RnqhSaU7pb3sJLj8WOShX+vwKqLIT1K LUn3wX3zqZNeIx/LMJT0O7tKsKjvKfI= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-658-aHToKdKYNYuNQOCOdOV9iA-1; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aHToKdKYNYuNQOCOdOV9iA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id c19-20020a05600c0ad300b00385bb3db625so1592002wmr.4 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:07:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fBJf1R7kBM9gH+xhtNa/kOhtVdAYjEafv1mIR3CkHEI=; b=s3ZNCRNPcK6QIvKiK/xT8qD8RV7tXNiTP7v/2XEcjGHWmWQOpxKWxK+OjTy0FM+7xa oayl2TWSm+mbQgoUbxcdXdPjPR4d871Yhm7D+Yeb1QuS8xvM2zbDiDH+dshVVt4+GUDo dUHoqHHxphjUV7X3An2V7njXpuPRcykeGcYioIZ4TySYYVXsmgSvrGV9ylRq3Oz/JG23 zP594XOr6kIJrbDO0Jmst9dgNdXltd2kDx6+kRtqCN8YM3oMTY53LYPSBVOkotwzv8M6 pC8QtdzBIh6q5NMJkmjOp7pdtUP/p1puLwEQv5cQEWU6EREdfK97MiKvJYe8w+i0tpmN EnLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KPqUz1aM2OmLB8BSvXvgnPcZew8pzfZM5JYrLsAQu67M2nTwp 4dEJASZnkjA1vcM4RKdfg1GMCug9IPPYoETjYgG+hKgZS4O5JYBOZqkMW+4Jt7su9cNEt7H8hdq 1H8gS44moEyk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c9f:b0:389:cf43:da64 with SMTP id k31-20020a05600c1c9f00b00389cf43da64mr4480405wms.206.1647371264835; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:07:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyzLlJbwR1xveI8URJ60kP+00Vz8I0FYYiVHPL3IeEWq8UXFCK8AWIjfhzlGgS3nbkP0cs5A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c9f:b0:389:cf43:da64 with SMTP id k31-20020a05600c1c9f00b00389cf43da64mr4480382wms.206.1647371264585; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c708:1800:42bd:3cac:d22a:3c62? (p200300cbc708180042bd3cacd22a3c62.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c708:1800:42bd:3cac:d22a:3c62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15-20020adfc74f000000b001e888b871a0sm16915200wrh.87.2022.03.15.12.07.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:07:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: fix race between lock page and clear PG_Isolated To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrew Yang , Matthias Brugger , Vlastimil Babka , David Howells , William Kucharski , Yang Shi , Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, Nicholas Tang , Kuan-Ying Lee References: <20220315030515.20263-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.com> <20220314212127.a2797926ee0ef8a7ad05dcaa@linux-foundation.org> <4cb789a5-c49c-f095-1f7e-67be65ba508a@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BD5AD1A0003 X-Stat-Signature: u6b3poh7i6iz8f1brt1q6ad5ux96ikga Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=a02ENoeA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1647371267-219823 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 15.03.22 18:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:45:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 15.03.22 05:21, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:05:15 +0800 Andrew Yang wrote: >>> >>>> When memory is tight, system may start to compact memory for large >>>> continuous memory demands. If one process tries to lock a memory page >>>> that is being locked and isolated for compaction, it may wait a long time >>>> or even forever. This is because compaction will perform non-atomic >>>> PG_Isolated clear while holding page lock, this may overwrite PG_waiters >>>> set by the process that can't obtain the page lock and add itself to the >>>> waiting queue to wait for the lock to be unlocked. >>>> >>>> CPU1 CPU2 >>>> lock_page(page); (successful) >>>> lock_page(); (failed) >>>> __ClearPageIsolated(page); SetPageWaiters(page) (may be overwritten) >>>> unlock_page(page); >>>> >>>> The solution is to not perform non-atomic operation on page flags while >>>> holding page lock. >>> >>> Sure, the non-atomic bitop optimization is really risky and I suspect >>> we reach for it too often. Or at least without really clearly >>> demonstrating that it is safe, and documenting our assumptions. >> >> I agree. IIRC, non-atomic variants are mostly only safe while the >> refcount is 0. Everything else is just absolutely fragile. > > We could add an assertion ... I just tried this: > > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h > @@ -342,14 +342,16 @@ static __always_inline \ > void __folio_set_##lname(struct folio *folio) \ > { __set_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy)); } \ > static __always_inline void __SetPage##uname(struct page *page) \ > -{ __set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); } > +{ VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(atomic_read(&policy(page, 1)->_refcount), page); \ > + __set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); } > > #define __CLEARPAGEFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \ > static __always_inline \ > void __folio_clear_##lname(struct folio *folio) \ > { __clear_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy)); } \ > static __always_inline void __ClearPage##uname(struct page *page) \ > -{ __clear_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); } > +{ VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(atomic_read(&policy(page, 1)->_refcount), page); \ > + __clear_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); } > > #define TESTSETFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \ > static __always_inline \ > > ... but it dies _really_ early: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0xffffffff820055e5 in native_halt () > at ../arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:57 > #1 halt () at ../arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:98 > #2 early_fixup_exception (regs=regs@entry=0xffffffff81e03cf8, > trapnr=trapnr@entry=6) at ../arch/x86/mm/extable.c:283 > #3 0xffffffff81ff243c in do_early_exception (regs=0xffffffff81e03cf8, > trapnr=6) at ../arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:419 > #4 0xffffffff81ff214f in early_idt_handler_common () > at ../arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:417 > #5 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () > > and honestly, I'm not sure how to debug something that goes wrong this > early. Maybe I need to make that start warning 5 seconds after boot > or only if we're not in pid 1, or something ... Maybe checking for "system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING" or "system_state >= SYSTEM_SCHEDULING" to exclude early boot where no (real) concurrency is happening. But I assume you'll still get plenty of such reports. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb