linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 12:12:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3072d7f-235e-4224-9867-4cebb66ca4fb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCcOx34j5mgiwfcx@kernel.org>

>> We'd have to be smart about memory blocks that fall into multiple regions,
>> but it should be a corner case and doable.
> 
> This is a corner case that should be handled regardless of the loop order.
> And I don't think it's handled today at all.
> 
> If we have a block that crosses node boundaries, current implementation of
> register_mem_block_under_node_early() will register it under the first
> node.

At least upstream behavior should be that it would be linked under all 
nodes. At least that's what I remember :)

>   
>> OTOH, we usually don't expect having a lot of regions, so iterating over
>> them is probably not a big bottleneck? Anyhow, just wanted to raise it.
> 
> There would be at least a region per node and having
> 
> for_each_online_node()
> 	for_each_mem_region()
> 
> makes the loop O(n²) for no good reason.

Yes, that's why I mentioned it. If we have many nodes it might 
definitely be relevant.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16  8:19 Donet Tom
2025-05-16  8:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] driver/base: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:05   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  8:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node Donet Tom
2025-05-16  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:58     ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:06   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  8:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/base : Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-16  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:11   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:07   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:09   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-16 10:12     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-16 11:00       ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 11:00   ` Donet Tom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3072d7f-235e-4224-9867-4cebb66ca4fb@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox