From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBF2C433F5 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 05:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 790398D0002; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 01:22:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 740878D0001; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 01:22:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 607E98D0002; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 01:22:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0001.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.1]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3D58D0001 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 01:22:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B75182751C8 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 05:22:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79292648442.30.3281039 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38E820034 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 05:22:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648444921; x=1679980921; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TssxZi5HbhRuTGitKGwvo5yP8Uu2MNcvCLKPIgM9VQA=; b=PefWj7yeM5rW3oKsOsMoqHGszD4i9OkavqW/bDWPk4E4MJfrhKzynl+z gxoW3g4l7nZYXE3TK8edHlFPw4doyar0LcTjYVy5xNOV2Fix25B+Z3kXb oScMpV8qyI5eajoBwSDzfwBHCxtzDiYUQQvfkGG6/pdfDezYbu9MeLZmZ PIHPXcrfGvqcE2K/ob9q75p7SqejyPmkvKfaZb1efVjBMQGchpzXRB0Kg 3HpmLNNvl1b8AYrDDNAqkfoqPUmxphFc0UXRUmMcw0RlSeTMBFzvhju9V Mn8zyGSMO4V3w+bs39atP5O8kE8oEPiv1QU92oOsTlpi7RKgGrGyDZ1gv Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10299"; a="246402836" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,216,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="246402836" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2022 22:21:58 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,216,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="520873240" Received: from rongch2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.169.179]) ([10.249.169.179]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2022 22:21:56 -0700 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Unsigned emails from Intel robot was Re: [linux-next:master 9122/14381] drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c:149:19: warning: unused function 'pca95xx_num_led_regs' To: Pavel Machek , kernel test robot , kernel list Cc: Andrew Jeffery , llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= References: <202203260634.OFB2IPFf-lkp@intel.com> <20220326092537.GA8704@amd> From: "Chen, Rong A" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:21:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220326092537.GA8704@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: ymu9849adtodxq4ejrdrsm7d1arkynaa Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PefWj7ye; spf=none (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of rong.a.chen@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.20) smtp.mailfrom=rong.a.chen@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D38E820034 X-HE-Tag: 1648444920-57009 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 3/26/2022 5:25 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hey robot! > >> FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > Could you please sign emails with real name of person responsible for > this? Was there human writing this? Hi Pavel, The report was generated automatically, we continue to optimize the bot to output the right result. > >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >> Reported-by: kernel test robot > > I'd preffer to credit human if human was involved. > >>>> drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c:149:19: warning: unused function 'pca95xx_num_led_regs' >> static inline int pca95xx_num_led_regs(int bits) >> ^ >> fatal error: error in backend: Nested variants found in inline asm string: ' .set push >> .set mips64r2 > > This sounds like an compiler problem, not a kernel problem, right? Yes, it's not related to your commit, sorry for the inconvenience, we'll take a look at it to avoid false positive next time. Best Regards, Rong Chen