From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: Reset mapping to TAIL_MAPPING before restoring vmemmap
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:32:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2447027-bc5f-461e-8fd8-93704dd543e4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab6d9bc7-4e6a-4604-9dca-44b13ce409b6@redhat.com>
On 15.04.25 09:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.04.25 07:47, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> commit 4eeec8c89a0c ("mm: move hugetlb specific things in folio to page[3]")
>> shifted hugetlb specific stuff, and now mapping overlaps _hugetlb_cgroup field.
>>
>> _hugetlb_cgroup is set to NULL when preparing the hugetlb page in
>> init_new_hugetlb_folio().
>> For a better picture, this is page->mapping before and after the comming
>> for the first three tail pages:
>>
>> before:
>> page: fffff51a44358040 0000000000000000
>> page: fffff51a44358080 0000000000000000
>> page: fffff51a443580c0 dead000000000400
>>
>> after:
>> page: fffff1f0042b0040 0000000000000000
>> page: fffff1f0042b0080 fffff1f0042b0090
>> page: fffff1f0042b00c0 0000000000000000
>>
>> Tail#2 has fffff1f0042b0090 because of the _deferred_list initialization,
>> which was also shifted, but that is not a problem.
>>
>> For HVO, upon restoring that gets copied in some tail pages (reset_struct_pages)
>> and so those tail pages will not have TAIL_MAPPING set and the check
>> in free_tail_page_prepare() will fail:
>>
>> kernel: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/0:3 pfn:10ac40
>> kernel: page does not match folio
>> kernel: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10ac40
>> kernel: flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
>> kernel: raw: 0017ffffc0000000 fffff1f0042b0000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> kernel: raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>> kernel: page dumped because: corrupted mapping in tail page
>>
>> Reset _hugetlb_cgroup to TAIL_MAPPING before restoring so tail pages have the
>> right value.
>
> Hi,
>
> To handle that for ordinary hugtlb alloc/free I added in that patch in free_tail_page_prepare():
>
> case 3:
> /* the third tail page: hugetlb specifics overlap ->mappings */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE))
> break;
> fallthrough;
> default:
> if (page->mapping != TAIL_MAPPING) {
> bad_page(page, "corrupted mapping in tail page");
> goto out;
> }
> break;
> }
>
> Now I am confused why that check doesn't catch that?
>
> Apparently only a problem with HVO? Because I recall testing the ordinary alloc/free.
Ah, reading about the HVO hackery in the comment above NR_RESET_STRUCT_PAGE, might the following fix it?
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
index 9a99dfa3c4958..27245e86df250 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
@@ -238,11 +238,11 @@ static void vmemmap_remap_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
* struct page, the special metadata (e.g. page->flags or page->mapping)
* cannot copy to the tail struct page structs. The invalid value will be
* checked in the free_tail_page_prepare(). In order to avoid the message
- * of "corrupted mapping in tail page". We need to reset at least 3 (one
- * head struct page struct and two tail struct page structs) struct page
+ * of "corrupted mapping in tail page". We need to reset at least 4 (one
+ * head struct page struct and three tail struct page structs) struct page
* structs.
*/
-#define NR_RESET_STRUCT_PAGE 3
+#define NR_RESET_STRUCT_PAGE 4
static inline void reset_struct_pages(struct page *start)
{
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 5:47 Oscar Salvador
2025-04-15 7:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 7:32 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-04-15 7:48 ` Muchun Song
2025-04-15 8:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-04-15 8:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-16 7:21 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-16 7:53 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2447027-bc5f-461e-8fd8-93704dd543e4@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox