From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B566C433E0 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36A023877 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F36A023877 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 79F0D8D01E2; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:47:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 775D18D01B2; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:47:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 665098D01E2; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:47:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F4E8D01B2 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:47:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E512288D for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77709043104.01.ink55_2a1081827532 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CB8101E335E for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: ink55_2a1081827532 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5008 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610740030; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CqTXrqY5WOpLVbfIkQazPRNF8DOg7J3nam2cFtoi1LU=; b=g4QtRCYRTadMoo251YJXX4QNuuB4gqlBB1N2MreyjkSKhhJ+QA9nK0GUiLqdqvOJs+T13P vr/FffzRhdRgUm3cXMmTjS/SvatVMSXqvN48uIq1TjOAHasDxuCTjo//M11eTv3FZ/z6bG VK3Gju5/NHEHgR1UkbphBldb/De0IZ8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-542-lwD9702uPka_VHursUlkEQ-1; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:47:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lwD9702uPka_VHursUlkEQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF7D18C89E4; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.11] (ovpn-112-11.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDFD60BF3; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: restore full accuracy in COW page reuse To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yu Zhao , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Xu , Pavel Emelyanov , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Minchan Kim , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Hugh Dickins , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , John Hubbard , Leon Romanovsky , Jan Kara , Kirill Tkhai , Nadav Amit , Jens Axboe References: <20210110004435.26382-1-aarcange@redhat.com> <20210115183721.GG4605@ziepe.ca> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 20:46:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210115183721.GG4605@ziepe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: >> 7) There is no easy way to detect if a page really was pinned: we might >> have false positives. Further, there is no way to distinguish if it was >> pinned with FOLL_WRITE or not (R vs R/W). To perform reliable tracking >> we most probably would need more counters, which we cannot fit into >> struct page. (AFAIU, for huge pages it's easier). > > I think this is the real issue. We can only store so much information, > so we have to decide which things work and which things are broken. So > far someone hasn't presented a way to record everything at least.. I do wonder how many (especially long-term) GUP readers/writers we have to expect, and especially, support for a single base page. Do we have a rough estimate? With RDMA, I would assume we only need a single one (e.g., once RDMA device; I'm pretty sure I'm wrong, sounds too easy). With VFIO I guess we need one for each VFIO container (~ in the worst case one for each passthrough device). With direct I/O, vmsplice and other GUP users ?? No idea. If we could somehow put a limit on the #GUP we support, and fail further GUP (e.g., -EAGAIN?) once a limit is reached, we could partition the refcount into something like (assume max #15 GUP READ and #15 GUP R/W, which is most probably a horribly bad choice) [ GUP READ ][ GUP R/W ] [ ordinary ] 31 ... 28 27 ... 24 23 .... 0 But due to saturate handling in "ordinary", we would lose further 2 bits (AFAIU), leaving us "only" 22 bits for "ordinary". Now, I have no idea how many bits we actually need in practice. Maybe we need less for GUP READ, because most users want GUP R/W? No idea. Just wild ideas. Most probably that has already been discussed, and most probably people figured that it's impossible :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb