From: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Invitation] bi-weekly guest_memfd upstream call on 2025-04-17
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:46:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a185919f-1567-47bd-946f-0a66486404db@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <971a3797-5fc4-4c7f-a856-dca05f9a874e@redhat.com>
On 4/16/2025 7:58 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> our next guest_memfd upstream call is scheduled for Thursday,
> 2025-04-17 at 8:00 - 9:00am (GMT-07:00) Pacific Time - Vancouver.
>
> We'll be using the following Google meet:
> http://meet.google.com/wxp-wtju-jzw
>
> The meeting notes can be found at [1], where we also link recordings and
> collect current guest_memfd upstream proposals. If you want an google
> calendar invitation that also covers all future meetings, just write me
> a mail.
>
>
> If nothing else comes up, let's talk about the next steps to get basic
> mmap support [2] ready for upstream, to prepare for actual in-place
> conversion, direct-map removal and much more.
>
> In particular, let's talk about what "basic mmap support" is, and what
> we can use it for without actual in-place conversion: IIUC "only shared
> memory in guest_memfd" use cases and some cases of software-protected
> VMs can use it.
>
> Also, let's talk about the relationship/expectations between guest_memfd
> and the user (mmap) address when it comes to KVM memory slots that have
> a guest_memfd that supports "shared" memory.
>
>
> To put something to discuss onto the agenda, reply to this mail or add
> them to the "Topics/questions for next meeting(s)" section in the
> meeting notes as a comment.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M6766BzdY1Lhk7LiR5IqVR8B8mG3cr-
> cxTxOrAosPOk/edit?usp=sharing
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250318161823.4005529-1-
> tabba@google.com/T/#u
>
Hi David,
If we have time, I'd like to discuss about my v4 posting of shared
device assignment support
(https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250407074939.18657-1-chenyi.qiang@intel.com/)
which introduces a new abstract parent class of RamDiscardManager, and a
new priority listener to apply to in-place conversion. Hope to get some
suggestion or confirmation if I'm in the correct direction.
Thanks
Chenyi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 11:58 David Hildenbrand
2025-04-16 13:20 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-17 2:46 ` Chenyi Qiang [this message]
2025-04-17 7:14 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a185919f-1567-47bd-946f-0a66486404db@intel.com \
--to=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox