From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [shmem] 7a7256d5f5: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:02:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0e2af81-39de-8c25-e7bd-f2234a0d7f8b@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1MymJ/INb45AdaY@iweiny-desk3>
On 10/21/22 17:00, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> I was about to get this patch ready to send when I found this:
>
> commit b6ebaedb4cb1a18220ae626c3a9e184ee39dd248
> Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Sep 4 15:47:08 2015 -0700
>
> userfaultfd: avoid mmap_sem read recursion in mcopy_atomic
>
> If the rwsem starves writers it wasn't strictly a bug but lockdep
> doesn't like it and this avoids depending on lowlevel implementation
> details of the lock.
>
> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: delete weird BUILD_BUG_ON()]
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> ...
>
> So I wonder if the true fix is something to lockdep?
>
> Regardless I'll send the below patch because it will restore things to a
> working order.
with ; added to each + line.
> But I'm CC'ing Andrea for comments.
>
> Ira
>
>>
>> Ira
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index 8280a5cb48df..6c8e99bf5983 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -2424,9 +2424,11 @@ int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>>
>> if (!zeropage) { /* COPY */
>> page_kaddr = kmap_local_folio(folio, 0);
>> + pagefault_disable()
>> ret = copy_from_user(page_kaddr,
>> (const void __user *)src_addr,
>> PAGE_SIZE);
>> + pagefault_enable()
>> kunmap_local(page_kaddr);
>>
>> /* fallback to copy_from_user outside mmap_lock */
>>
>>
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-22 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 4:10 kernel test robot
2022-10-21 13:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-21 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2022-10-21 22:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-21 22:48 ` Ira Weiny
2022-10-22 0:00 ` Ira Weiny
2022-10-22 0:02 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2022-10-22 0:08 ` Ira Weiny
2022-10-22 0:17 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0e2af81-39de-8c25-e7bd-f2234a0d7f8b@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox