From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1681219uge for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:00:57 -0500 From: "Adam Litke" Subject: Re: [PATCH] shm: Fix the filename of hugetlb sysv shared memory In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <787b0d920706062027s5a8fd35q752f8da5d446afc@mail.gmail.com> <20070606204432.b670a7b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <787b0d920706062153u7ad64179p1c4f3f663c3882f@mail.gmail.com> <20070607162004.GA27802@vino.hallyn.com> <46697EDA.9000209@us.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Albert Cahalan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Badari Pulavarty List-ID: On 6/8/07, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > -struct file *hugetlb_zero_setup(size_t size) > +struct file *hugetlb_file_setup(const char *name, size_t size) The bulk of this patch seems to handle renaming this function. Is that really necessary? -- Adam Litke ( agl at us.ibm.com ) IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org