linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+ec1b7575afef85a0e5ca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	guro@fb.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel panic: corrupted stack end in wb_workfn
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:58:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a06830e7-e396-6dd5-d9d5-2a7b1df9efc1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+Z2FL=t8cHceXMGvG2QfChKdJYprVvBonu9X+jJaL0HMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019/03/20 19:42, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> I mean, yes, I agree, kernel bug bisection won't be perfect. But do
>> you see anything actionable here?

Allow users to manually tell bisection range when
automatic bisection found a wrong commit.

Also, allow users to specify reproducer program
when automatic bisection found a wrong commit.

Yes, this is anti automation. But since automation can't become perfect,
I'm suggesting manual adjustment. Even if we involve manual adjustment,
the syzbot's plenty CPU resources for building/testing kernels is highly
appreciated (compared to doing manual bisection by building/testing kernels
on personal PC environments).

> 
> I see the larger long term bisection quality improvement (for syzbot
> and for everybody else) in doing some actual testing for each kernel
> commit before it's being merged into any kernel tree, so that we have
> less of these a single program triggers 3 different bugs, stray
> unrelated bugs, broken release boots, etc. I don't see how reliable
> bisection is possible without that.
> 

syzbot currently cannot test kernels with custom patches (unless "#syz test:" requests).
Are you saying that syzbot will become be able to test kernels with custom patches?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-20 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-31  3:41 syzbot
2018-12-31  3:41 ` syzbot
2018-12-31  3:47 ` Qian Cai
2018-12-31  6:31   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-12-31  6:31     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-17 20:49 ` syzbot
2019-03-19 18:03   ` Xin Long
2019-03-20  9:56   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-03-20  9:59     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-20 10:23       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-20 10:38         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-20 10:42           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-20 10:58             ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2019-03-20 13:59               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-20 13:34           ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-03-20 13:57             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-21  9:45               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-21  9:51                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-21 11:41                   ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a06830e7-e396-6dd5-d9d5-2a7b1df9efc1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=syzbot+ec1b7575afef85a0e5ca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox