From: Jonathan Morton <chromi@cyberspace.org>
To: barryn@pobox.com, zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:42:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a05100316b80221a2f45f@[192.168.239.101]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011028191328.CCC828A6EA@pobox.com>
> > Unfortunately, things didn't change on my first disk (IBM 7200rpm
>> @home). I'm still getting low numbers, check the vmstat output at the
>> end of the email.
>>
>> But, now I found something interesting, other two disk which are on
>> the standard IDE controller work correctly (writing is at 17-22
>> MB/sec). The disk which doesn't work well is on the HPT366 interface,
>> so that may be our culprit. Now I got the idea to check patches
> > retrogradely to see where it started behaving poorely.
>This really reminds me of a problem I once had with a hard drive of
>mine. It would usually go at 15-20MB/sec, but sometimes (under both
>Linux and Windows) would slow down to maybe 350KB/sec. The slowdown, or
>lack thereof, did seem to depend on the alignment of the stars. I lived
>with it for a number of months, then started getting intermittent I/O
>errors as well, as if the drive had bad sectors on disk.
>
>The problem turned out to be insufficient ventilation for the controller
>board on the bottom of the drive
As an extra datapoint, my IBM Deskstar 60GXP's (40Gb version) runs
slightly slower with writing than with reading. This is on a VIA
686a controller, UDMA/66 active. The drive also has plenty of air
around it, being in a 5.25" bracket with fans in front.
Writing 1GB from /dev/zero takes 34.27s = 29.88MB/sec, 19% CPU
Reading 1GB from test file takes 29.64s = 34.58MB/sec, 18% CPU
Hmm, that's almost as fast as the 10000rpm Ultrastar sited just above
it, but with higher CPU usage. Ultrastar gets 36MB/sec on reading
with hdparm, haven't tested write performance due to probable
fragmentation.
Both tests conducted using 'dd bs=1k' on my 1GHz Athlon with 256Mb
RAM. Test file is on a freshly-created ext2 filesystem starting at
10Gb into the 40Gb drive (knowing IBM's recent trend, this'll still
be fairly close to the outer rim). Write test includes a sync at the
end. Kernel is Linus 2.4.9, no relevant patches.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: chromi@cyberspace.org (not for attachments)
website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/vnc/
geekcode: GCS$/E dpu(!) s:- a20 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$
V? PS PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*)
tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-28 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-24 10:42 Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-24 14:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-10-25 0:25 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-25 4:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25 4:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25 12:48 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-25 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25 17:33 ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26 9:45 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 10:08 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26 14:57 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 17:30 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-28 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 17:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 18:56 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-30 8:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-30 9:26 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-28 19:13 ` Barry K. Nathan
2001-10-28 21:42 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2001-11-02 5:52 ` Zlatko's I/O slowdown status Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 20:14 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-11-02 20:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-02 21:22 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-11-02 20:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 23:23 ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-27 13:14 ` xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically Giuliano Pochini
2001-10-28 5:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-25 9:07 ` Zlatko Calusic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='a05100316b80221a2f45f@[192.168.239.101]' \
--to=chromi@cyberspace.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=barryn@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox