From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe against irqs
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:53:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0328dd3-db4a-430a-9018-db796d0cf76e@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGj-7pUJQZD59Sx7E69Uvi1++dB59R8wWkDYvSTGYhU-18AHXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:31:09AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:47 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Shakeel - This breaks the build in mm-new for me:
> >
> > CC mm/pt_reclaim.o
> > In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/rmwcc.h:5,
> > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:18,
> > from ./include/linux/bitops.h:68,
> > from ./include/linux/radix-tree.h:11,
> > from ./include/linux/idr.h:15,
> > from ./include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:13,
> > from mm/memcontrol.c:28:
> > mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘mem_cgroup_alloc’:
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:39:45: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘__seg_gs’
> > 39 | #define __percpu_seg_override CONCATENATE(__seg_, __percpu_seg)
> > | ^~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/args.h:25:24: note: in definition of macro ‘__CONCAT’
> > 25 | #define __CONCAT(a, b) a ## b
> > | ^
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:39:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘CONCATENATE’
> > 39 | #define __percpu_seg_override CONCATENATE(__seg_, __percpu_seg)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:93:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu_seg_override’
> > 93 | # define __percpu_qual __percpu_seg_override
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:60:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu_qual’
> > 60 | # define __percpu __percpu_qual BTF_TYPE_TAG(percpu)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > mm/memcontrol.c:3700:45: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu’
> > 3700 | struct memcg_vmstats_percpu *statc, __percpu *pstatc_pcpu;
> > | ^~~~~~~~
> > mm/memcontrol.c:3731:25: error: ‘pstatc_pcpu’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘kstat_cpu’?
> > 3731 | pstatc_pcpu = parent->vmstats_percpu;
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > | kstat_cpu
> > mm/memcontrol.c:3731:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >
> > The __percpu macro seems to be a bit screwy with comma-delimited decls, as it
> > seems that putting this on its own line fixes this problem:
> >
>
> Which compiler (and version) is this? Thanks for the fix.
gcc 15, but apparently 13, 14 also fail. It seems independent of config.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 18:41 [PATCH v2 0/7] memcg: make memcg stats irq safe Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-15 12:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-15 14:31 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-15 14:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-05-15 15:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-15 15:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-15 14:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-15 15:21 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-17 0:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] memcg: move preempt disable to callers of memcg_rstat_updated Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] memcg: make mod_memcg_state re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] memcg: make count_memcg_events " Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] memcg: make __mod_memcg_lruvec_state " Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] memcg: no stock lock for cpu hot-unplug Shakeel Butt
2025-05-14 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] memcg: objcg stock trylock without irq disabling Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0328dd3-db4a-430a-9018-db796d0cf76e@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox