From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0895D58E78 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 530AF6B0005; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 03:09:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4DEA06B008A; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 03:09:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 38C3A6B008C; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 03:09:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A866B0005 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 03:09:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45089C2FEE for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:09:25 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84500398290.27.25533B6 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68448120004 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=TF6xmoM1; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of david@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1772438963; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=3EW502Ai4m9SnR7c/+uLrup92MDLZfgqK2HsNoUQ7Ko=; b=faORCpUcVtv/HgRvO8qiiNFCkvQXG0uKUXJVEBLugz/PrP8ZbuuhFT8cdj4p8NMtACnz8w eVz9qDjID8eWfx26EMBGXj6akTHy0zOyxpee27mvlH7rlMxLAai4e236L4eGulCE/Og/u3 Rg/QITQJ+WPVyoVKtlgpODX/XhokAI4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=TF6xmoM1; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of david@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1772438963; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Gj2AMN+epem0LcJYv++EjQjA6uiAiaGh/YfrtWb2kD7OH7EL49LenZu57eSIAG+evBeaPO 8M3DW2rvm4FsWhXu/PxeDTw7UQAtP16aXEw9v1KpugkiUxWdMPSHqMx67v3j7VpDolNtLx NWEWYAs85Y68slv4xwA8SdlOzcti+Ag= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60526440C1; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35630C19423; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:09:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772438962; bh=FqBCPiof80sYQVn6PUFltJWkTioFCV7WXdE9UKQ7PRc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=TF6xmoM1xb1BmDnHJGEYYK4djC4sZPGpc5YK/nAz7HzJ1voYUouiCetVuo4MDwIpB 6zABBzdYxHDeL41uNqVAX1tuBhYFK91ibtgQRO3fwM1RvwD5iMZYlIFEuIDv2pkz/u UfmnJhWi16+xkmfzi4Mr6GzFG0kCrcEryF3fjlWJ94GUjDYfn+xqfI4lLa6y9wv3l2 CDygaFMQ4D+7OXNntYjczvYmpenkTHXU7sBr1ZEaL3BTj5QsLgUPSPuPc0ohEzyIF8 Y6Fv8UYd+pvl01YZ4KQwdKLNNBRMW0+MN0Wc1pYz4LP9dyabdnwudPjvSu3mkYbDAu mI4cxujLVJIAA== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:09:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] page_reporting: change PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER to -1 To: Yuvraj Sakshith , Michael Kelley Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mst@redhat.com" , "kys@microsoft.com" , "haiyangz@microsoft.com" , "wei.liu@kernel.org" , "decui@microsoft.com" , "longli@microsoft.com" , "jasowang@redhat.com" , "xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com" , "eperezma@redhat.com" , "lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com" , "Liam.Howlett@oracle.com" , "vbabka@suse.cz" , "rppt@kernel.org" , "surenb@google.com" , "mhocko@suse.com" , "jackmanb@google.com" , "hannes@cmpxchg.org" , "ziy@nvidia.com" , "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20260227140655.360696-1-yuvraj.sakshith@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260227140655.360696-5-yuvraj.sakshith@oss.qualcomm.com> From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzS5EYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCAoQ3VycmVudCkgPGRhdmlkQGtlcm5lbC5vcmc+wsGQBBMBCAA6AhsDBQkmWAik AgsJBBUKCQgCFgICHgUCF4AWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3AP+DWgUCaYJt/AIZAQAKCRBN 3hD3AP+DWriiD/9BLGEKG+N8L2AXhikJg6YmXom9ytRwPqDgpHpVg2xdhopoWdMRXjzOrIKD g4LSnFaKneQD0hZhoArEeamG5tyo32xoRsPwkbpIzL0OKSZ8G6mVbFGpjmyDLQCAxteXCLXz ZI0VbsuJKelYnKcXWOIndOrNRvE5eoOfTt2XfBnAapxMYY2IsV+qaUXlO63GgfIOg8RBaj7x 3NxkI3rV0SHhI4GU9K6jCvGghxeS1QX6L/XI9mfAYaIwGy5B68kF26piAVYv/QZDEVIpo3t7 /fjSpxKT8plJH6rhhR0epy8dWRHk3qT5tk2P85twasdloWtkMZ7FsCJRKWscm1BLpsDn6EQ4 jeMHECiY9kGKKi8dQpv3FRyo2QApZ49NNDbwcR0ZndK0XFo15iH708H5Qja/8TuXCwnPWAcJ DQoNIDFyaxe26Rx3ZwUkRALa3iPcVjE0//TrQ4KnFf+lMBSrS33xDDBfevW9+Dk6IISmDH1R HFq2jpkN+FX/PE8eVhV68B2DsAPZ5rUwyCKUXPTJ/irrCCmAAb5Jpv11S7hUSpqtM/6oVESC 3z/7CzrVtRODzLtNgV4r5EI+wAv/3PgJLlMwgJM90Fb3CB2IgbxhjvmB1WNdvXACVydx55V7 LPPKodSTF29rlnQAf9HLgCphuuSrrPn5VQDaYZl4N/7zc2wcWM7BTQRVy5+RARAA59fefSDR 9nMGCb9LbMX+TFAoIQo/wgP5XPyzLYakO+94GrgfZjfhdaxPXMsl2+o8jhp/hlIzG56taNdt VZtPp3ih1AgbR8rHgXw1xwOpuAd5lE1qNd54ndHuADO9a9A0vPimIes78Hi1/yy+ZEEvRkHk /kDa6F3AtTc1m4rbbOk2fiKzzsE9YXweFjQvl9p+AMw6qd/iC4lUk9g0+FQXNdRs+o4o6Qvy iOQJfGQ4UcBuOy1IrkJrd8qq5jet1fcM2j4QvsW8CLDWZS1L7kZ5gT5EycMKxUWb8LuRjxzZ 3QY1aQH2kkzn6acigU3HLtgFyV1gBNV44ehjgvJpRY2cC8VhanTx0dZ9mj1YKIky5N+C0f21 zvntBqcxV0+3p8MrxRRcgEtDZNav+xAoT3G0W4SahAaUTWXpsZoOecwtxi74CyneQNPTDjNg azHmvpdBVEfj7k3p4dmJp5i0U66Onmf6mMFpArvBRSMOKU9DlAzMi4IvhiNWjKVaIE2Se9BY FdKVAJaZq85P2y20ZBd08ILnKcj7XKZkLU5FkoA0udEBvQ0f9QLNyyy3DZMCQWcwRuj1m73D sq8DEFBdZ5eEkj1dCyx+t/ga6x2rHyc8Sl86oK1tvAkwBNsfKou3v+jP/l14a7DGBvrmlYjO 59o3t6inu6H7pt7OL6u6BQj7DoMAEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJgIbDBYhBBvZyq1zXEw6Rg38yk3e EPcA/4NaBQJonNqrBQkmWAihAAoJEE3eEPcA/4NaKtMQALAJ8PzprBEXbXcEXwDKQu+P/vts IfUb1UNMfMV76BicGa5NCZnJNQASDP/+bFg6O3gx5NbhHHPeaWz/VxlOmYHokHodOvtL0WCC 8A5PEP8tOk6029Z+J+xUcMrJClNVFpzVvOpb1lCbhjwAV465Hy+NUSbbUiRxdzNQtLtgZzOV Zw7jxUCs4UUZLQTCuBpFgb15bBxYZ/BL9MbzxPxvfUQIPbnzQMcqtpUs21CMK2PdfCh5c4gS sDci6D5/ZIBw94UQWmGpM/O1ilGXde2ZzzGYl64glmccD8e87OnEgKnH3FbnJnT4iJchtSvx yJNi1+t0+qDti4m88+/9IuPqCKb6Stl+s2dnLtJNrjXBGJtsQG/sRpqsJz5x1/2nPJSRMsx9 5YfqbdrJSOFXDzZ8/r82HgQEtUvlSXNaXCa95ez0UkOG7+bDm2b3s0XahBQeLVCH0mw3RAQg r7xDAYKIrAwfHHmMTnBQDPJwVqxJjVNr7yBic4yfzVWGCGNE4DnOW0vcIeoyhy9vnIa3w1uZ 3iyY2Nsd7JxfKu1PRhCGwXzRw5TlfEsoRI7V9A8isUCoqE2Dzh3FvYHVeX4Us+bRL/oqareJ CIFqgYMyvHj7Q06kTKmauOe4Nf0l0qEkIuIzfoLJ3qr5UyXc2hLtWyT9Ir+lYlX9efqh7mOY qIws/H2t In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 68448120004 X-Stat-Signature: t6116qi6u53mbk1kh5481p3y4889m1rd X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-HE-Tag: 1772438963-430653 X-HE-Meta: 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 rzHkbrks KhJUZwUgiwHEirnZFnF1cPlqq1qNJUkdigh+Mw1VurzIPcZKOcShNrp8aiNCoSOmNQJAmtDI2N4Y5lelS9rItmsAMY/+D5Vx4qQnbZ0ZEOT3KrhaEu8nVV5qxroudkqCnTeWiZ/cgIGolTlUr602Kp2sNG8e/igYm5ja0ksLJCN0t+Whb44zDvVOWkkpsbkmRXL3H4Ggv6uGY/1qbXZ/IzNoa5JWMH2ehJm6pU8tTxXRKRzXDHMpFlIOUfmRFqIHwFFhoshiEkRSvWmvUNYK3848zCUva6KblYdt+MjTvnuyJFB9lqXWcjZcrh9JNesQFxYQhJU6Hv3Ywo72yAcDIjL1NAXdDS1r7mDiHp+HMXLhOmAcZFyAgzn0VKHpOBipfGv5PjotUNRDsFyGYGiDR6I8FQQ42DBdvpHkO7klzdf+P6JzODaL9+l2Hqw== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 3/2/26 09:00, Yuvraj Sakshith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 08:42:57AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >> On 3/2/26 06:25, Michael Kelley wrote: >>> From: Yuvraj Sakshith Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2026 7:33 PM >>> >>> I don't think what you propose is correct. The purpose of testing >>> page_reporting_order for -1 is to see if a page reporting order has >>> been specified on the kernel boot line. If it has been specified, then >>> the page reporting order specified in the call to page_reporting_register() >>> [either a specific value or the default] is ignored and the kernel boot >>> line value prevails. But if page_reporting_order is -1 here, then >>> no kernel boot line value was specified, and the value passed to >>> page_reporting_register() should prevail. >>> >>> With this in mind, substituting PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER >>> for the -1 in the test doesn’t exactly make sense to me. The -1 in the >>> test doesn't have quite the same meaning as the -1 for >>> PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER. You could even use -2 for >>> the initial value of page_reporting_order, and here in the test, in >>> order to make that distinction obvious. Or use a separate symbolic >>> name like PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_NOT_SET. >> > Option 1: > > if (page_reporting_order == PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER) { > if (page_reporting_order != PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER > && prdev->order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > page_reporting_order = prdev->order; > } else { > page_reporting_order = pageblock_order; > } > } > > Option 2: > > if (page_reporting_order == PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_NOT_SET) { > if (page_reporting_order != PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER > && prdev->order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > page_reporting_order = prdev->order; > } else { > page_reporting_order = pageblock_order; > } > } > > >> I don't really see a difference between "PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER" >> and "PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_NOT_SET" that would warrant a split and adding >> confusion for the page-reporting drivers. >> >> In both cases, we want "no special requirement, just use the default". >> Maybe we can use a better name to express that. > > Agreed. > > If we were to read this code without context, wouldn't it be confusing as to > why PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER is being checked in the first place? I proposed in one of the last mail that "PAGE_REPORTING_USE_DEFAULT_ORDER" could be clearer, stating that it's not really an order just yet. Maybe just using PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_UNSET might be clearer. > > Option 1 checks if page_reporting_order is equal to PAGE_REPORTING_DEFAULT_ORDER > and then immediately checks if its not equal to it. Which is a bit confusing.. Because it's wrong? :) We're not supposed to check page_reporting_order a second time. Assume we s/PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER/PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_UNSET/ and actually check prdev->order: if (page_reporting_order == PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_UNSET) { if (prdev->order != PAGE_REPORTING_ORDER_UNSET && prdev->order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { page_reporting_order = prdev->order; } else { page_reporting_order = pageblock_order; } } -- Cheers, David