Re: [patch] mm, thp: add new background defrag option

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 01/10/2017 04:38 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>>>> Any suggestions for a better name for "background" are more than welcome.  
>>>
>>> Why not just "madvise+defer"?
>>>
>>
>> Seeing no other activity regarding this issue (omg!), I'll wait a day or 
>> so to see if there are any objections to "madvise+defer" or suggestions 
>> that may be better and repost.
> 
> I get very confused by the /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag
> versus enabled flags, and this may be a terrible, even more confusing,
> idea: but I've been surprised and sad to see defrag with a "defer"
> option, but poor enabled without one; and it has crossed my mind that
> perhaps the peculiar "madvise+defer" syntax in defrag might rather be
> handled by "madvise" in defrag with "defer" in enabled?  Or something
> like that: 4 x 4 possibilities instead of 5 x 3.

But would all the possibilities make sense? For example, if I saw
"defer" in enabled, my first expectation would be that it would only use
khugepaged, and no THP page faults at all - possibly including madvised
regions.

If we really wanted really to cover the whole configuration space, we
would have files called "enable", "defrag", "enable-madvise",
"defrag-madvise" and each with possible values "yes", "no", "defer",
where "defer" for enable* files would mean to skip THP page fault
completely and defer to khugepaged, and "defer" for defrag* files would
mean wake up kswapd/kcompactd and skip direct reclaim/compaction.

But, too late for that :)

> 
> Please be gentle with me,
> Hugh
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>