From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on s390
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:46:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzcKY8hap3OMqTjC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025151134.1275575-1-david@redhat.com>
On 10/25/24 at 05:11pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This is based on "[PATCH v3 0/7] virtio-mem: s390 support" [1], which adds
> virtio-mem support on s390.
>
> The only "different than everything else" thing about virtio-mem on s390
> is kdump: The crash (2nd) kernel allocates+prepares the elfcore hdr
> during fs_init()->vmcore_init()->elfcorehdr_alloc(). Consequently, the
> crash kernel must detect memory ranges of the crashed/panicked kernel to
> include via PT_LOAD in the vmcore.
>
> On other architectures, all RAM regions (boot + hotplugged) can easily be
> observed on the old (to crash) kernel (e.g., using /proc/iomem) to create
> the elfcore hdr.
>
> On s390, information about "ordinary" memory (heh, "storage") can be
> obtained by querying the hypervisor/ultravisor via SCLP/diag260, and
> that information is stored early during boot in the "physmem" memblock
> data structure.
>
> But virtio-mem memory is always detected by as device driver, which is
> usually build as a module. So in the crash kernel, this memory can only be
~~~~~~~~~~~
Is it 1st kernel or 2nd kernel?
Usually we call the 1st kernel as panicked kernel, crashed kernel, the
2nd kernel as kdump kernel.
> properly detected once the virtio-mem driver started up.
>
> The virtio-mem driver already supports the "kdump mode", where it won't
> hotplug any memory but instead queries the device to implement the
> pfn_is_ram() callback, to avoid reading unplugged memory holes when reading
> the vmcore.
>
> With this series, if the virtio-mem driver is included in the kdump
> initrd -- which dracut already takes care of under Fedora/RHEL -- it will
> now detect the device RAM ranges on s390 once it probes the devices, to add
> them to the vmcore using the same callback mechanism we already have for
> pfn_is_ram().
Do you mean on s390 virtio-mem memory region will be detected and added
to vmcore in kdump kernel when virtio-mem driver is initialized? Not
sure if I understand it correctly.
>
> To add these device RAM ranges to the vmcore ("patch the vmcore"), we will
> add new PT_LOAD entries that describe these memory ranges, and update
> all offsets vmcore size so it is all consistent.
>
> Note that makedumfile is shaky with v6.12-rcX, I made the "obvious" things
> (e.g., free page detection) work again while testing as documented in [2].
>
> Creating the dumps using makedumpfile seems to work fine, and the
> dump regions (PT_LOAD) are as expected. I yet have to check in more detail
> if the created dumps are good (IOW, the right memory was dumped, but it
> looks like makedumpfile reads the right memory when interpreting the
> kernel data structures, which is promising).
>
> Patch #1 -- #6 are vmcore preparations and cleanups
> Patch #7 adds the infrastructure for drivers to report device RAM
> Patch #8 + #9 are virtio-mem preparations
> Patch #10 implements virtio-mem support to report device RAM
> Patch #11 activates it for s390, implementing a new function to fill
> PT_LOAD entry for device RAM
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241025141453.1210600-1-david@redhat.com
> [2] https://github.com/makedumpfile/makedumpfile/issues/16
>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>
> David Hildenbrand (11):
> fs/proc/vmcore: convert vmcore_cb_lock into vmcore_mutex
> fs/proc/vmcore: replace vmcoredd_mutex by vmcore_mutex
> fs/proc/vmcore: disallow vmcore modifications after the vmcore was
> opened
> fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h
> fs/proc/vmcore: factor out allocating a vmcore memory node
> fs/proc/vmcore: factor out freeing a list of vmcore ranges
> fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM
> ranges in 2nd kernel
> virtio-mem: mark device ready before registering callbacks in kdump
> mode
> virtio-mem: remember usable region size
> virtio-mem: support CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM
> s390/kdump: virtio-mem kdump support (CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM)
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 39 +++--
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 103 +++++++++++++-
> fs/proc/Kconfig | 25 ++++
> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/linux/crash_dump.h | 47 +++++++
> include/linux/kcore.h | 13 --
> 8 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.46.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 15:11 David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] fs/proc/vmcore: convert vmcore_cb_lock into vmcore_mutex David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 9:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 8:16 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] fs/proc/vmcore: replace vmcoredd_mutex by vmcore_mutex David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 9:32 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 8:14 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] fs/proc/vmcore: disallow vmcore modifications after the vmcore was opened David Hildenbrand
2024-11-22 9:16 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-25 14:41 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-29 10:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 10:42 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-03 10:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 9:44 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 9:42 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-21 4:35 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-21 15:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] fs/proc/vmcore: factor out allocating a vmcore memory node David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 9:45 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] fs/proc/vmcore: factor out freeing a list of vmcore ranges David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 9:46 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM ranges in 2nd kernel David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 10:13 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 10:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 14:05 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-21 4:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-21 19:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-22 7:51 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22 7:31 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22 9:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] virtio-mem: mark device ready before registering callbacks in kdump mode David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] virtio-mem: remember usable region size David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] virtio-mem: support CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] s390/kdump: virtio-mem kdump support (CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM) David Hildenbrand
2024-11-04 6:21 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on s390 Baoquan He
2024-11-15 8:46 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-11-15 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 9:48 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzcKY8hap3OMqTjC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox