From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E24D132C8 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 83FA46B0083; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7EFDB6B0085; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:50:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6E03D6B0089; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:50:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5708B6B0083 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133FA160BC3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82748546664.02.EBC0A67 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B0980003 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf30.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ODZUPZxA; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf30.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 147.75.193.91 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1730728052; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=2yPspLq3+bUuEUXncoC8KPq1R+SFwF0LbRGF/keILUF6b+I0BEATn2NNFiDztPL81ZSran TzBALvWpp/9zVBsKX5fcs3uzxveOdOpWPVL+geqBuX+iyr0s4sWRrjV/g/QuURW4cDiS6O 7LcSi3TO11YIizDyiDa71YrDa0wZozU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf30.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ODZUPZxA; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf30.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 147.75.193.91 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1730728052; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=mGUiEneUoaV8wkqak8bhlL62oEqzwVNFjU0RDDV0f0s=; b=HaxuTjuo4W3/G7FGxtZ1VjXXFGg/sCfrZR0rl6AVYjdOlpoVD3FhYZaVQC43yf2j3xH0T9 9ByVfgYwlURxa7FO76L/B3WnPMz6EKkF+aKFZmjsL3YfU844QwynxyPKYSpZukemD0BiKB bG+PJRCSVhWw5TY1yxgBMU7rGns+0HU= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7346EA42F6C; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0FABC4CECE; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730728218; bh=gHreMDif9HESvX6AXP7OsdTpnwAWyyEiLjrEvTpLHVo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ODZUPZxAxatXofqe2Bld8arK3JWihWtKbNZfcXqX1Qf87UMLWi3hF/TzVU959+6em fM185BPRmGZp26BoXlrsTz610JqrwDi0WcRxnPrsP6ToWjoeft2AbY3ew4lJVvjYLh b3UsoWIw+j2Ee8wSQLuN11csURoY/J+vxNvd+/OCTj3WAYEq6JlEJULA/ex4wqUfXB vON8dyM58tsQTjxhAuZ7kksGBxhcdFgtGzesTATQbB9zAIieSHFnasG5fVTZEzvLcu 2EYAFZcBWUjRisQxl3Th16iOEEIZHoWmT+UzvffCOYLTZsRoWSJ7W8/Xb6xfgD8bM4 cfxzweH6TjX0Q== Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:47:40 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: SeongJae Park , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , "Liam R . Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn , Alice Ryhl , Boqun Feng , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation Message-ID: References: <8e02f3a4-d498-401d-aaba-e53ed2ac6a3a@lucifer.local> <20241101234832.56873-1-sj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Stat-Signature: xm9ag1ato1ugxygofpkmh4kxys7j4c9k X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 42B0980003 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1730728159-139254 X-HE-Meta: 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 8BWyn86V qX/kALllZwUJTUqd9jCsh3/Tz8xIi0jwR/KnEY4K50gj5jio+/iU3f3KrUAS63hzxmN43z5kQ/F0KWc7vgwR3uD4Qcu5T/4u/TAKX9YdzG6I6ATGZ0uGt38pp82WCzB1vzh6uVWgbPfv286yvJo99JyRFacQQ35bRTJLZHWQ50YkON+i3ZI6bR+fkaLy9dUvrWMpJxx81C/ojfz/4TmObm07bK/k7CvZSvvnXOj7LNJ9pB3TBjuDuIMPBAL4P1Joy1QtBVnPT4Xfi0x6u8f1VSdQtMikQntZAwN+B6Yi245DMpO0uXiLlm2SqW8pQUBQTJ3ZFh3VCi96Tu3mhXfiDWjyAne/5A9uZOKny X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:02:19PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:48:32PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote: > > > > This is the "Unsorted Documentation" section. If the document is really for > > the section, I'd suggest putting it in alphabetically sorted order, for the > > consistency. However, if putting the document under the section is not your > > real intention, I think it might be better to be put under "Process Addresses" > > section above. What do you think? > > Well, at the moment it's sort of a WIP thing that we may want to put under > another section, was just putting there somewhat arbitrarily for now. > > I also wanted to avoid too much debate about what to put where :P > > But absolutely, ack, will either sort it there or put it somewhere more > sensible, thanks! Don't mean to bikeshed, but it would make sense to put it to the "Process Address (space)" part :) -- Sincerely yours, Mike.