From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:37:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zyi/+gogCHVPtKjZ@feng-clx.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79335db3-4528-446e-a839-272645133e19@suse.cz>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:45:51PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/4/24 12:28, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:20:36PM +0800, Tang, Feng wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> So I think in __do_krealloc() we should do things manually to determine ks
> >> > >> and not call ksize(). Just not break any of the cases ksize() handles
> >> > >> (kfence, large kmalloc).
> >> > >
> >> > > OK, originally I tried not to expose internals of __ksize(). Let me
> >> > > try this way.
> >> >
> >> > ksize() makes assumptions that a user outside of slab itself is calling it.
> >> >
> >> > But we (well mostly Kees) also introduced kmalloc_size_roundup() to avoid
> >> > querying ksize() for the purposes of writing beyond the original
> >> > kmalloc(size) up to the bucket size. So maybe we can also investigate if the
> >> > skip_orig_size_check() mechanism can be removed now?
> >>
> >> I did a quick grep, and fortunately it seems that the ksize() user are
> >> much less than before. We used to see some trouble in network code, which
> >> is now very clean without the need to skip orig_size check. Will check
> >> other call site later.
> >
> >
> > I did more further check about ksize() usage, and there are still some
> > places to be handled. The thing stands out is kfree_sensitive(), and
> > another potential one is sound/soc/codecs/cs-amp-lib-test.c
> >
> > Some details:
> >
> > * Thanks to Kees Cook, who has cured many cases of ksize() as below:
> >
> > drivers/base/devres.c: total_old_size = ksize(container_of(ptr, struct devres, data));
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c: } else if (size > ksize(q_vector)) {
> > net/core/skbuff.c: *size = ksize(data);
> > net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c: new_acts_size = max(next_offset + req_size, ksize(*sfa) * 2);
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c: alloc_bytes = max(ksize(orig), kmalloc_size_roundup(bytes));
> >
> > * Some callers use ksize() mostly for calculation or sanity check,
> > and not for accessing those extra space, which are fine:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c: WARN_ON(dev + 1 > (struct drm_device *) (container + ksize(container)));
> > lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c: actual_bytes_used = ksize(stream);
> > lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c: actual_bytes_used += ksize(frag_container);
> > lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c: actual_bytes_used += ksize(frag_container->fragment);
> > mm/nommu.c: return ksize(objp);
> > mm/util.c: memcpy(n, kasan_reset_tag(p), ksize(p));
> > security/tomoyo/gc.c: tomoyo_memory_used[TOMOYO_MEMORY_POLICY] -= ksize(ptr);
> > security/tomoyo/memory.c: const size_t s = ksize(ptr);
> > drivers/md/dm-vdo/memory-alloc.c: add_kmalloc_block(ksize(p));
> > drivers/md/dm-vdo/memory-alloc.c: add_kmalloc_block(ksize(p));
> > drivers/md/dm-vdo/memory-alloc.c: remove_kmalloc_block(ksize(ptr));
> >
> > * One usage may need to be handled
> >
> > sound/soc/codecs/cs-amp-lib-test.c: KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, ksize(buf), priv->cal_blob->size, "Buffer to small");
> >
> > * bigger problem is the kfree_sensitive(), which will use ksize() to
> > get the total size and then zero all of them.
> >
> > One solution for this could be get the kmem_cache first, and
> > do the skip_orig_size_check()
>
> Maybe add a parameter for __ksize() that controls if we do
> skip_orig_size_check(), current ksize() will pass "false" to it (once
> remaining wrong users are handled), then another ksize_internal() variant
> will pass "true" and be used from kfree_sensitive()?
Sounds good to me! And for future wrong usages of ksize(), we can fix
them case by case when they are deteced.
Thanks,
Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 6:45 Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/kasan: Don't store metadata inside kmalloc object when slub_debug_orig_size is on Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: Move krealloc() and related code to slub.c Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-02 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 6:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-04 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 10:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 7:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 8:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 12:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 14:20 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-11-04 11:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-11-04 11:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-04 12:37 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2024-10-14 20:35 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zyi/+gogCHVPtKjZ@feng-clx.sh.intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox