From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>,
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<ying.huang@intel.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
<fengwei.yin@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] cacded5e42: aim9.brk_test.ops_per_sec -5.0% regression
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:34:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxGtFCzk5kwycFV3@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac1e101c-f3ed-4e9a-9ef4-37788fce4680@lucifer.local>
hi, Lorenzo,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:54:13AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:58:38AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks for this. As far as I'm concerned this puts us into noise territory,
> so we'll go with this as the solution!
>
> A side-note, the brk2 test from the will-it-scale suite, written explicitly
> to be more real-world representative, sees an actual performance
> _improvement_ here (though small).
>
> So overall I'm comfortable with this, we can revisit if anybody raises any
> objection! The benefit in de-duplicating code is very significant.
thanks a lot for all these informations!
>
> Thanks for all your help, hugely appreciated!
you are welcome :) just our great pleasure!
>
> Cheers, Lorenzo
>
> [snip]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 2:21 kernel test robot
2024-09-30 8:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-08 8:31 ` Oliver Sang
2024-10-08 8:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-09 6:44 ` Oliver Sang
2024-10-09 9:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-09 21:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-11 2:46 ` Oliver Sang
2024-10-11 7:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-15 19:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-17 2:58 ` Oliver Sang
2024-10-17 8:54 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-18 0:34 ` Oliver Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxGtFCzk5kwycFV3@xsang-OptiPlex-9020 \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=spasswolf@web.de \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox