linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, david@redhat.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:06:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw_IT136rxW_KuhU@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1728548374.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 05:58:10PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Considering that tmpfs already has the 'huge=' option to control the THP
> allocation, it is necessary to maintain compatibility with the 'huge='
> option, as well as considering the 'deny' and 'force' option controlled
> by '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled'.

No, it's not.  No other filesystem honours these settings.  tmpfs would
not have had these settings if it were written today.  It should simply
ignore them, the way that NFS ignores the "intr" mount option now that
we have a better solution to the original problem.

To reiterate my position:

 - When using tmpfs as a filesystem, it should behave like other
   filesystems.
 - When using tmpfs to implement MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, it should
   behave like anonymous memory.

No more special mount options.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-10  9:58 Baolin Wang
2024-10-10  9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper Baolin Wang
2024-10-10  9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order bitmap Baolin Wang
2024-10-10  9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm: shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths for tmpfs Baolin Wang
2024-10-10  9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] docs: tmpfs: add documention for 'write_size' huge option Baolin Wang
2024-10-16  7:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs Kefeng Wang
2024-10-16  9:29   ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 13:45     ` Kefeng Wang
2024-10-17  9:52       ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 14:06 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-10-17  9:34   ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-17 11:26     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21  6:24       ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-21  8:54         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21 13:34           ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-22  3:41             ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 15:31               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-23  8:04                 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-23  9:27                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-24 10:49                     ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-24 10:52                       ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-25  2:56                       ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-25 20:21                       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28  9:48                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31  3:43                           ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31  8:53                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 10:04                               ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 10:46                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-05 12:45                                   ` Baolin Wang
2024-11-05 14:56                                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-06  3:17                                       ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 10:46                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 21:56                         ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-29 12:20                           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-22  3:34           ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 10:06             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-23  9:25               ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zw_IT136rxW_KuhU@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox