From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com,
syzbot+61123a5daeb9f7454599@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm, kasan, kmsan: copy_from/to_kernel_nofault
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:27:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwT6_gzV2evijOGK@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACzwLxh1yWXQZ4LAO3gFMjK8KPDFfNOR6wqWhtXyucJ0+YXurw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:46PM +0500, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 1:32 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 09:48PM +0500, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> > > Instrument copy_from_kernel_nofault() with KMSAN for uninitialized kernel
> > > memory check and copy_to_kernel_nofault() with KASAN, KCSAN to detect
> > > the memory corruption.
> > >
> > > syzbot reported that bpf_probe_read_kernel() kernel helper triggered
> > > KASAN report via kasan_check_range() which is not the expected behaviour
> > > as copy_from_kernel_nofault() is meant to be a non-faulting helper.
> > >
> > > Solution is, suggested by Marco Elver, to replace KASAN, KCSAN check in
> > > copy_from_kernel_nofault() with KMSAN detection of copying uninitilaized
> > > kernel memory. In copy_to_kernel_nofault() we can retain
> > > instrument_write() for the memory corruption instrumentation but before
> > > pagefault_disable().
> >
> > I don't understand why it has to be before the whole copy i.e. before
> > pagefault_disable()?
> >
>
> I was unsure about this decision as well - I should've waited for your response
> before sending the PATCH when I was asking for clarification. Sorry
> for the confusion,
> I thought that what you meant as the instrumentation was already done after
> pagefault_disable().
I just did some digging and there is some existing instrumentation, but
not for what we want. The accesses in the loop on x86 do this:
copy_to_kernel_nofault:
#define __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
__put_user_size(*((type *)(src)), (__force type __user *)(dst), \
sizeof(type), err_label)
and __put_user_size:
#define __put_user_size(x, ptr, size, label) \
do { \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __x = (x); /* eval x once */ \
__typeof__(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); /* eval ptr once */ \
__chk_user_ptr(__ptr); \
switch (size) { \
case 1: \
__put_user_goto(__x, __ptr, "b", "iq", label); \
break; \
case 2: \
__put_user_goto(__x, __ptr, "w", "ir", label); \
break; \
case 4: \
__put_user_goto(__x, __ptr, "l", "ir", label); \
break; \
case 8: \
__put_user_goto_u64(__x, __ptr, label); \
break; \
default: \
__put_user_bad(); \
} \
instrument_put_user(__x, __ptr, size); \
} while (0)
which already has an instrument_put_user, which expands to this:
#define instrument_put_user(from, ptr, size) \
({ \
kmsan_copy_to_user(ptr, &from, sizeof(from), 0); \
})
So this is already instrumented for KMSAN, to check no uninitialized
memory is accessed - but that's only useful if copying to user space.
__put_kernel_nofault is "abusing" the same helper to copy to the kernel,
so adding explicit instrumentation as proposed still makes sense.
Thanks,
-- Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-05 9:23 [PATCH] mm, kmsan: instrument copy_from_kernel_nofault Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-05 10:36 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-05 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] mm, kasan, kmsan: copy_from/to_kernel_nofault Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-05 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-08 8:31 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-08 8:46 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-08 9:27 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2024-10-08 10:15 ` [PATCH v3] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-08 11:35 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-08 19:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-08 19:34 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-08 19:42 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-09 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-09 20:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-10-09 20:34 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-10 13:11 ` [PATCH v5] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-10 21:39 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-10-11 3:53 ` [PATCH v6] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-12 22:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-10-15 11:05 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-10-08 19:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwT6_gzV2evijOGK@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=snovitoll@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+61123a5daeb9f7454599@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox