From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: root memcgroup for metadata filemap_add_folio()
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 02:19:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zvu-n6NFL8wo4cOA@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5fef5372ae454a7b6da4f2f75c427aeab6a07d6.1727498749.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:15:56PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BACKGROUND]
> The function filemap_add_folio() charges the memory cgroup,
> as we assume all page caches are accessible by user space progresses
> thus needs the cgroup accounting.
>
> However btrfs is a special case, it has a very large metadata thanks to
> its support of data csum (by default it's 4 bytes per 4K data, and can
> be as large as 32 bytes per 4K data).
> This means btrfs has to go page cache for its metadata pages, to take
> advantage of both cache and reclaim ability of filemap.
FYI, in general reclaims for metadata work much better with a shrinker
than through the pagecache, because it can be object based and
prioritized.
> [ENHANCEMENT]
> Instead of relying on __GFP_NOFAIL to avoid charge failure, use root
> memory cgroup to attach metadata pages.
>
> Although this needs to export the symbol mem_root_cgroup for
> CONFIG_MEMCG, or define mem_root_cgroup as NULL for !CONFIG_MEMCG.
>
> With root memory cgroup, we directly skip the charging part, and only
> rely on __GFP_NOFAIL for the real memory allocation part.
This looks pretty ugly. What speaks against a version of
filemap_add_folio that doesn't charge the memcg?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-28 4:45 Qu Wenruo
2024-09-30 17:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-09-30 22:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-01 1:37 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-01 2:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-01 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-01 9:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-02 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-03 20:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-03 8:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-03 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-03 8:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-03 20:58 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zvu-n6NFL8wo4cOA@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox