Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] mm: zswap: Modify zswap_stored_pages to be atomic_long_t.

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 07:57:49PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:16 PM Kanchana P Sridhar
> <kanchana.p.sridhar@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > For zswap_store() to support large folios, we need to be able to do
> > a batch update of zswap_stored_pages upon successful store of all pages
> > in the folio. For this, we need to add folio_nr_pages(), which returns
> > a long, to zswap_stored_pages.
> 
> Do we really need this? A lot of places in the kernel assign the
> result of folio_nr_pages() to an int (thp_nr_pages(),
> split_huge_pages_all(), etc). I don't think we need to worry about
> folio_nr_pages() exceeding INT_MAX for a while.

You'd be surprised.  Let's assume we add support for PUD-sized pages
(personally I think this is too large to make sense, but some people can't
be told).  On arm64, we can have a 64kB page size, so that's 13 bits per
level for a total of 2^26 pages per PUD.  That feels uncomfortable close
to 2^32 to me.

Anywhere you've found that's using an int to store folio_nr_pages() is
somewhere we should probably switch to long.  And this, btw, is why I've
moved from using an int to store folio_size() to using size_t.  A PMD is
already 512MB (with a 64KB page size), and so a PUD will be 4TB.

thp_nr_pages() is not a good example.  I'll be happy when we kill it;
we're actually almost there.