linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	hailong.liu@oppo.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	v-songbaohua@oppo.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: clarify nofail memory allocation
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:46:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZscW-3o89VoKq5a-@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiJ6BerHAcvVCkm6gH5X8V-ktkxajXv0VZMW5HtvWsJgg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu 22-08-24 18:30:12, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Sorry, on mobile right now, so HTML crud ]
> 
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, 17:59 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > > And make it clear that it will return NULL if somebody misuses it.
> >
> > What do you expect users do with the return value then?
> >
> 
> NOT. YOUR. PROBLEM.
> 
> It's the problem of the caller.

They have already told you they (believe) have no way to handle the failure.
So if they learn they can get NULL they will either BUG_ON, put a loop
around that or just close eyes and hope for the best. I argue that
neither of that is a good option because it leads to a poor and buggy
code.

Look Linus, I believe we are getting into a circle and I do not have
much more to offer into this discussion. I do agree with you that we
should define boundaries of GFP_NOFAIL more explicitly. Documentation we
have is not an effective way. I strongly disagree that WARN_ONCE and
just return NULL and close eyes is a good programming nor it encourages
a good programming on the caller side. I have offered to explicitly oops
in those cases inside the allocator (while not holding any internal
allocator locks) as a sreasonable compromise. I even believe that this
is a useful tool in other contexts as well. I haven't heard your opinion
on that so far. If I had time to work on that myself I would give it a
try.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-22 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-17  6:24 Barry Song
2024-08-17  6:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] vduse: avoid using __GFP_NOFAIL Barry Song
2024-08-17  6:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: document __GFP_NOFAIL must be blockable Barry Song
2024-08-17  6:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: BUG_ON to avoid NULL deference while __GFP_NOFAIL fails Barry Song
2024-08-19  9:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19  9:47     ` Barry Song
2024-08-19  9:55       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 10:02         ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 12:33           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 12:48             ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 12:49               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 17:12                 ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 17:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19 20:24                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 20:35                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19 21:57                       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 22:13                         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20  6:17                         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 12:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-19 12:51               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 12:53                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-19 13:14                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 13:05                 ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 13:10                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 13:19                     ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 13:22                       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-17  6:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: prohibit NULL deference exposed for unsupported non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL Barry Song
2024-08-18  2:55   ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-18  3:48     ` Barry Song
2024-08-18  5:51       ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-18  6:27         ` Barry Song
2024-08-18  6:45           ` Barry Song
2024-08-18  7:07             ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-18  7:25               ` Barry Song
2024-08-19  7:51               ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19  7:50     ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19  9:25       ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-19  9:39         ` Barry Song
2024-08-19  9:45           ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-19 10:10             ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 11:56               ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-19 12:09                 ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 12:17                   ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-19 14:01                     ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 10:17         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 11:56           ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-19 12:04             ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19  9:44   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 10:19     ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-19 12:48       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: clarify nofail memory allocation David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 16:05   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19 19:23     ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 19:33       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19 21:48         ` Barry Song
2024-08-20  6:24         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-21 12:40     ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-21 22:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  6:21         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  6:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  6:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  7:47               ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  7:57                 ` Barry Song
2024-08-22  8:24                   ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  8:39                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22  9:08                       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  9:16                         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  9:24                           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  9:11                       ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  9:18                         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  9:33                           ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  9:44                             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  9:59                               ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22 10:30                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22 10:46                                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-08-22  9:27                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22  9:34                           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22  9:43                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22  9:53                               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-22 11:58                                 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-08-26 12:10                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-27  6:57                               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-27  7:15                               ` Barry Song
2024-08-27  7:38                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-27  7:50                                   ` Barry Song
2024-08-29 10:24                                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-29 11:53                                       ` Barry Song
2024-08-29 13:20                                         ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-29 21:27                                           ` Barry Song
2024-08-29 22:31                                             ` Barry Song
2024-08-30  7:24                                               ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-30  7:37                                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-22  9:41                           ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  9:42                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22  7:01             ` Gao Xiang
2024-08-22  7:54               ` Michal Hocko
2024-08-22  8:04                 ` Gao Xiang
2024-08-22 14:35                   ` Yafang Shao
2024-08-22 15:02                     ` Gao Xiang
2024-08-22  6:37       ` Barry Song
2024-08-22 14:22         ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZscW-3o89VoKq5a-@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hailong.liu@oppo.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox