* [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate()
@ 2024-08-20 17:54 Liam R. Howlett
2024-08-20 22:38 ` Hillf Danton
2024-08-20 22:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-08-20 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Liam R. Howlett,
syzbot+036af2f0c7338a33b0cd
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
The write lock should be held when validating the tree to avoid updates
racing with checks. Holding the rcu read lock during a large tree
validation may also cause a prolonged rcu read window.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000001d12d4062005aea1@google.com/
Fixes: 54a611b60590 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+036af2f0c7338a33b0cd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 755ba8b18e14..fe1b01b29201 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -7588,14 +7588,14 @@ static void mt_validate_nulls(struct maple_tree *mt)
* 2. The gap is correctly set in the parents
*/
void mt_validate(struct maple_tree *mt)
+ __must_hold(mas->tree->ma_lock)
{
unsigned char end;
MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
- rcu_read_lock();
mas_start(&mas);
if (!mas_is_active(&mas))
- goto done;
+ return;
while (!mte_is_leaf(mas.node))
mas_descend(&mas);
@@ -7616,9 +7616,6 @@ void mt_validate(struct maple_tree *mt)
mas_dfs_postorder(&mas, ULONG_MAX);
}
mt_validate_nulls(mt);
-done:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_validate);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate()
2024-08-20 17:54 [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate() Liam R. Howlett
@ 2024-08-20 22:38 ` Hillf Danton
2024-08-20 22:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2024-08-20 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam R. Howlett
Cc: Andrew Morton, maple-tree, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Paul E. McKenney, Liam R. Howlett, syzbot+036af2f0c7338a33b0cd
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:54:17 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
>
> The write lock should be held when validating the tree to avoid updates
> racing with checks. Holding the rcu read lock during a large tree
> validation may also cause a prolonged rcu read window.
>
From the rcu stall's view, holding spin lock plays the same role of rcu
read lock, so what are you fixing by simply dropping rcu read lock?
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000001d12d4062005aea1@google.com/
> Fixes: 54a611b60590 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+036af2f0c7338a33b0cd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 755ba8b18e14..fe1b01b29201 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -7588,14 +7588,14 @@ static void mt_validate_nulls(struct maple_tree *mt)
> * 2. The gap is correctly set in the parents
> */
> void mt_validate(struct maple_tree *mt)
> + __must_hold(mas->tree->ma_lock)
> {
> unsigned char end;
>
lockdep_assert_held(ma_lock); instead
> MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
> - rcu_read_lock();
> mas_start(&mas);
> if (!mas_is_active(&mas))
> - goto done;
> + return;
>
> while (!mte_is_leaf(mas.node))
> mas_descend(&mas);
> @@ -7616,9 +7616,6 @@ void mt_validate(struct maple_tree *mt)
> mas_dfs_postorder(&mas, ULONG_MAX);
> }
> mt_validate_nulls(mt);
> -done:
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_validate);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate()
2024-08-20 17:54 [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate() Liam R. Howlett
2024-08-20 22:38 ` Hillf Danton
@ 2024-08-20 22:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2024-08-20 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton
Cc: Liam R. Howlett, Andrew Morton, maple-tree, linux-mm,
linux-kernel, Paul E. McKenney, syzbot+036af2f0c7338a33b0cd
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 06:38:45AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
Hillf, your email client is STILL broken. It's using the same message
ID as the email it's replying to, which causes all kinds of problems.
Please fix it or change to a different client.
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:54:17 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> >
> > The write lock should be held when validating the tree to avoid updates
> > racing with checks. Holding the rcu read lock during a large tree
> > validation may also cause a prolonged rcu read window.
> >
> >From the rcu stall's view, holding spin lock plays the same role of rcu
> read lock, so what are you fixing by simply dropping rcu read lock?
He's not holding a spinlock, he's holding a mutex, which has very
different properties.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-20 22:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-20 17:54 [PATCH] maple_tree: Remove rcu_read_lock() from mt_validate() Liam R. Howlett
2024-08-20 22:38 ` Hillf Danton
2024-08-20 22:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox